|
[Sponsors] |
August 27, 2014, 07:50 |
NACA 0012 2D validation
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 12 |
I have no good experience to aerodynamic analysis. I did some assignments in University days but I want to laern more and doing the validation as per given from here http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/naca0012_val.html.
However I first run at angle of 10 deg but I get very small Cl. I think I am doing some mistake in setup or calculation. Few questions... I read in books that in 2D, the lift coefficient Cl is per unit span length, so the equation for coefficient of lift is: cl_2D=Lift per span length/(0.5 * rho * V^2 * C) In 3D it is CL_3D=Lift/(0.5 * rho * V^2 * A) C is chord length, and rho and V are the freestream conditions and A is planform area.. Now, if I do 2D simulation in fluent, How do I calculate cl_2D coefficient in 2D manually using above formula? Is this Cl calculation would tally with the NASA validation data? Sorry for my poor English, its not my first language |
|
September 1, 2014, 07:16 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 473
Rep Power: 20 |
Lift/span in 3D should be equal to Lift produced in 2D simulation in FLUENT and the Cl data should match with results
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NACA 0012 2D validation | cfdseeker | CFX | 15 | December 30, 2014 16:42 |
NACA 0012 validation Drag problems | leo_NM | FLUENT | 7 | August 8, 2014 15:18 |
Naca 0012 validation, Cd value is too high. | Peter88 | OpenFOAM | 4 | January 21, 2014 17:10 |
2D NACA 0012 Airfoil Validation | nvtrieu | FLUENT | 0 | May 30, 2013 11:22 |
naca 0012 validation case: wrong Cd | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | July 15, 2011 12:50 |