|
[Sponsors] |
October 30, 2013, 18:00 |
Help confirming accuracy of simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
andrew thompson
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ohio
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am a student and was wondering if anyone could help in confirming that our results are accurate and usable. Our group is new to the CFD programs, and would just like a second opinion to make sure moving forward in our designing and testing is not completely useless and based off of incorrect data. attached is an image of the velocity contours. the case and data and mesh we used are too big to upload. the numbers at the end of iteration 100001 are
100001 3.7343e-02 5.4284e-04 3.7937e-04 7.3227e-04 6.8157e-04 0:00:00 0 We used the realizable k-epsilon viscous model, with standard wall function. simple scheme, pressure PRESTO!, standard initialization, and residuals of 0.00001. if any more information is needed please let me know. like i said, we are new to this and need a second pair of eyes to confirm that our results are usable. thanks for your time |
|
Tags |
air multiplier, airfoil, converge, convergence, fluent |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a simulation with rotation and vibration | liuzexiang | CFX | 34 | September 16, 2013 09:12 |
GUI crash and simulation engine still running | RPJones | FLOW-3D | 2 | November 9, 2010 09:18 |
Intake Flow Simulation Accuracy | atlantis83 | FLUENT | 0 | April 25, 2010 06:18 |
Temporal accuracy | ganesh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 29, 2008 06:32 |
On the simulation accuracy. | raintung | FLUENT | 1 | March 31, 2003 10:26 |