|
[Sponsors] |
September 25, 2013, 07:39 |
Flow over MAV
|
#1 |
New Member
|
Hi All,
I am facing a different issue here. I want to simulate flow over MAV (Micro Air Vehicle). I created two Mesh in ANSYS workbench. Both are Tet mesh, with one Boundary layer (at Y+ = 1, calculated according to my Re). My flow condition are, air as flow medium, Re from 20,000 to 200,000 and different angle of attack from -5 to 20 degree. With first mesh (without boundary layer mesh), simulate flow in fluent using Spallart Allamarus model. My Cl (Coefficient of Lift) is in good match with experiment data). My Cd (Coeff of Drag) is deviating from Exp. My Drag from simulation is too low from experimental values. Now, tried with second mesh with boundary layer. And simulated the same flow. Now the problem is that, My drag coefficient is even 3% lower than before one (without boundary layer mesh). This is what confusing me. With good boundary layer mesh, my fluent solver should be able to resolve my sub-viscous boundary layer which helps in better predicting drag co-efficient. But I am getting reverse. Is there anythng wrong? Am I missing anything. If any details required, I am very happy to provided. I want to resolve this issue. Please help me out..
__________________
Dinesh Babu CFD Engineer |
|
September 26, 2013, 07:52 |
|
#2 |
New Member
|
Fond answer... Please close this thread...
__________________
Dinesh Babu CFD Engineer |
|
Tags |
aircraft, drag, fluent, mav |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Different flow patterns in CFX and Fluent | avi@lpsc | FLUENT | 4 | April 8, 2012 07:12 |
Flow meter Design | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 3 | June 21, 2011 09:33 |
potential flow vs. Euler flow | curious ... | Main CFD Forum | 23 | July 21, 2006 08:40 |
Plug Flow | Franck | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 4, 2003 06:57 |