CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

No periodic flow structure while one is expected

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 4, 2013, 07:06
Default No periodic flow structure while one is expected
  #1
Member
 
Bart A.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 0
ziggo is on a distinguished road
I am running a transient 3D simulation on the geometry shown in the attachment.
I use the k-epsilon standard model.

I have done successful grid refinement study and the aerodynamic coefficients are close to the wind tunnel reference data.
However, no matter what time step I use (tried 0.01, 0.004, 0.0005s) I don't get a periodic wake structure with shed vortices.
The flow is as shown in the attachment for the full running time (except for the beginning where the flow is not fully established yet).

I've varied my Reynolds number (tried 500000 and 50000) but this did not make any difference. I kept getting a steady state solution with no flow oscillations.
I have the feeling that some artificial damping is preventing the periodic shedding.

What can be the problem?
If you need more information I am happy to provide it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg geometry.jpg (23.4 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg velocity vectors side.jpg (97.3 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg velocity vectors upper.jpg (91.4 KB, 3 views)
ziggo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2013, 08:52
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 17
duri is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggo View Post
However, no matter what time step I use (tried 0.01, 0.004, 0.0005s) I don't get a periodic wake structure with shed vortices.
The flow is as shown in the attachment for the full running time (except for the beginning where the flow is not fully established yet).

I've varied my Reynolds number (tried 500000 and 50000) but this did not make any difference. I kept getting a steady state solution with no flow oscillations.
Usually wake from turbulent flows are not periodic when shedding from stationary structures. How do you know wake is periodic. If so, at what reynolds number and what is the periodicity of wake.
duri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2013, 09:33
Default
  #3
Member
 
Bart A.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 0
ziggo is on a distinguished road
I was not aware of the fact that turbulent flows are a-periodic. Have you got references about this?

I found the graph shown in the attachment in the book of Blevins called Flow Induced Vibration. This graphs shows that a 2D wedge has a Strouhal number of around 0.17 for Re=1e4.

I figured that Re=5e4 is in the same order of magnitude and expected some vortex shedding.
ziggo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2013, 11:54
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 17
duri is on a distinguished road
From my understanding, with increase in reynolds number in turbulence regime vortex shedding will lose its periodicity. Periodic vortex occurs only in some range of reynolds number that ends in low turbulence flow.
Probably you need to figure out the reynolds number at which periodic vortex occurs for your configuration. Comparing 2d flow and 3d flow doesn't make much sense.
duri is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
periodic flow, unsteady flow


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Periodic Pipe Flow LES; parabolic profile jrrelx FLUENT 34 August 13, 2015 18:58
Periodic boundary conditions for 2D pipe (water flow). thess FLUENT 3 May 31, 2012 14:38
Periodic flow librasu FLUENT 1 August 18, 2008 13:24
Instability and Vortex/roll structure Z. Zeng Main CFD Forum 3 May 10, 2000 06:18
Possible?: Periodic conditions with non-constant mass flow rate. Ray FLUENT 0 April 10, 2000 07:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49.