|
[Sponsors] |
June 17, 2013, 15:57 |
help with boundary profile in pressure inlet
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi
I built a 2-d model, using pressure inlet and pressure outlet. I have the experimental inlet boundary total pressure data(attached). I used these data for a boundary profile. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I saved the mesh file, boundary profile and other conditions in a gmail account (fluent111, PIN:1234506789), if anyone interested, please go to have a look.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ the other settings are as below: operating pressure : 0 psi pressure inlet total pressure : profile pressure inlet static pressure : 9.819 psi pressure out static pressure : 14.7 psi total temperature for all is 300 K The problem is: when I choose inlet as compute from, it shows "_1.#IND" for x velocity, y velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent dissipation rate, and "_1.#INF" for temperature. I cannot run, it give me AMG error directly. If I still use the boudanry profile as the pressure inlet total pressure, but input values for x velocity, y velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent dissipation rate, and temperature for initialization, I can run it only when X velocity was set below 300 m/s, if it was set above 300m/s, it gave me the AMG divergence directly. But with 300m/s, the results is not right. Anybody has any idea about this? Thanks Last edited by quiqui; June 18, 2013 at 12:38. Reason: attached BL profile |
|
June 18, 2013, 02:09 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
do you have 2 inlets with different settings?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
June 18, 2013, 10:37 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
no, I only have one inlet, one outlet.
|
|
June 18, 2013, 10:46 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
attached is the sketch and profile data.
|
|
June 18, 2013, 10:54 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
I know that I always had some unstabilities with pressure-inlet/pressure-outlet.
Are you computing compressible?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
June 18, 2013, 11:06 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
Are you saying that your expect your result to depend on the initialization? Or what do you mean by "But with 300m/s, the results is not right."?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
June 18, 2013, 11:07 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
||
June 18, 2013, 11:10 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
Quote:
operating pressure : 0 psi Shouldn't that be 70 then?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
||
June 18, 2013, 11:11 |
|
#9 | |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Quote:
One stupid question: on your profile, I see you have points with total pressure = 0 psi -->
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
||
June 18, 2013, 11:13 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
In experiments, with total pressure @ 70 psi, total temperature 300k, static pressure 9.819psi @ inlet, the velocity is M=1.9, which is around 500 m/s. without importing the data profile, the computing results are similar with experimental, but once importing the boundary total pressure data profile, all the problems I mentioned above appeared. |
||
June 18, 2013, 11:16 |
|
#11 | |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
I tried running without profile, it gave the experimental trend, but after some running, I import the profile, It gave me the error immediately. |
||
June 18, 2013, 11:18 |
|
#12 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
||
June 18, 2013, 11:18 |
|
#13 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
June 18, 2013, 11:21 |
|
#14 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
||
June 18, 2013, 11:22 |
|
#15 | |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Quote:
At wall you have no velocity (if stationnary wall), which means no dymamic pressure. But the static pressure should remain. (ptot= pstatic + pdynamic = pstatic + 0 = pstatic )
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
||
June 18, 2013, 11:31 |
|
#16 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
yes, I notice this. I will remove the o points and try.
|
|
June 18, 2013, 11:35 |
|
#17 | |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
still cannot run the case |
||
June 18, 2013, 12:12 |
|
#19 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
||
June 18, 2013, 13:23 |
|
#20 |
Senior Member
|
Using density based solver (uniform inlet pressure, averaged from pressure profile data) and solver is running without problems.
Few points : 1. Mesh is not good enough 2. Place outlet further downstream. 3. Check boundary conditions |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radiation interface | hinca | CFX | 15 | January 26, 2014 18:11 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
Pressure Inlet Boundary Condition | Prasad | FLUENT | 6 | April 9, 2013 22:32 |
How to set up the inlet boundary condition for a low pressure case? | beastieboys6 | FLUENT | 3 | April 10, 2012 23:46 |