|
[Sponsors] |
May 30, 2013, 11:22 |
2D NACA 0012 Airfoil Validation
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi everyone,
I am doing simulation for NACA 0012 foil and I want to compare with the experimental data as well as numerical data from NASA. http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/naca0012_val_sst.html However, I still confuse about the turbulent condition as follow: # NACA 0012, 897x257 grid, CFL3D with SST model, # freestream k/a_inf^2=9.e-9 # freestream omega*mu_inf/(rho_inf*a_inf^2)=1.e-6 # Lifting results have point vortex farfield correction on # Note: results very near T.E. have high numerical error - see Swanson & Turkel, AIAA 87-1107, 1987 # (Results here given to greater accuracy than convergence tolerance) What do the # freestream k/a_inf^2=9.e-9 and # freestream omega*mu_inf/(rho_inf*a_inf^2)=1.e-6 mean? I guess that these are the input parameters for turbulent model. But I do not know how to implement these into CFD codes. Please explain for me! Thank you very much! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2D NACA 0012 Airfoil Validation Case (NASA) | jp3g12 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 24 | April 23, 2021 15:34 |
NACA 0012 validation Drag problems | leo_NM | FLUENT | 7 | August 8, 2014 15:18 |
Naca 0012 validation, Cd value is too high. | Peter88 | OpenFOAM | 4 | January 21, 2014 17:10 |
naca 0012 validation case: wrong Cd | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | July 15, 2011 12:50 |
Laminar flow past oscillating Naca 0012 airfoil | kafkaf | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 7, 2009 03:49 |