|
[Sponsors] |
May 13, 2013, 17:58 |
NACA 0012 validation Drag problems
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 14 |
Good Night
I'm simulating the NACA 0012 at 10º and Re-6000000. The setup is: -Solver -- Pressure Based -K-epsilon - Realizable - Enhaced Wall Function -Velocity Inlet (x-68.93m/s y-12.1 m/s) Pressure Outlet. -Simple - Green Gauss Node Based - Second order Upwind for the rest. -Standart initialization from inlet. The Cl is very close from the validation but the Cd is negative ?!?! I attached some images. What's the setup you guys use for this case ? Is my Mesh the problem ? The airfoil is 20c from the walls. thanks |
|
May 14, 2013, 00:11 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 14 |
Yes the components are correct. Cd- 1x // 0y // 0z Cl- 0x// 1y // 0z.
thanks |
|
May 14, 2013, 00:27 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Thank you for posting the values of your cl&cd direction vectors. The components are incorrect. The correct value should be
cd:< cos(alpha), sin(alpha), 0 > cl: <-sin(alpha), cos(alpha), 0> I assume that the chord of your airfoil is parallel with the x-axis in your simulation. |
|
May 14, 2013, 18:12 |
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 14 |
THANK YOU !!!
It worked !! The Cd is now very close to experimental ones. I used your "formula" and it worked very well but why the "sin" in lift is negative ? thank you ! |
|
May 14, 2013, 22:18 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
The lift & drag is in regard to the free stream flow. It is just a simple coordinate transformation. The drag in most of the sketches is in parallel with x-direction is because in aviation the flow is horizontal (x-direction) . Now that the free stream flow in your simulation has an angle with the x-direction you have to calculate your lift & drag according to the free-stream direction rather than the x-/y- direction.
|
|
May 15, 2013, 13:17 |
K-w
|
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
I gave the K-w a chance. I used the K-w, but the solution went crazy with turbulance viscosity and reversed flow on pressure outlet messages, besides the variation of 10^7 in cd and Cl coefficients. I did the mesh again taking care or the y+ but it didn't work. Any recomendation of K-w setup for subsonic simulations ? thanks !! |
||
August 8, 2014, 15:18 |
Result intrepretetion
|
#8 |
New Member
Arun
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
wat fluent gives is body force tat is CA-cd and CN-cl for zero AOA only(axial and normal force coeff).SO
Cl=CN*cos(aoa)-CA*sin(aoa) CD=CA*cos(aoa)+CN*sin(aoa) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to import NACA 0012 Profile in Gridgen | maplepink | Main CFD Forum | 17 | May 7, 2013 14:01 |
NACA 0012 Case Will Not Converge | dancfd | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | November 14, 2011 20:09 |
Overpredicted cl and cd on NACA 0012 (with Fluent) | KevinK | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 28, 2009 13:30 |
Problems with flat plate and NACA 0012 Lift/Force | Harly | FLUENT | 0 | June 18, 2007 11:02 |
NACA 0012 simulation results | Luis | FLUENT | 3 | February 15, 2006 12:42 |