|
[Sponsors] |
Comparaison inviscid 3D Fluent/CFX/Xflr5/"in-house" code |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 8, 2013, 13:46 |
Comparaison inviscid 3D Fluent/CFX/Xflr5/"in-house" code
|
#1 |
New Member
Antoine
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
I'm working on 3D CFD analysis of an airfoil and I compared the results obtained with several different codes. That's my results for the aerodynamic coefficients : mach = 0.10 alfa = 0 CL = 0.1357 (in-house code) CL = 0.0548 (CFX) CL = 0.0662 (Fluent) CL = 0.1308 (XFLR5) CM = -8.5438E-02 (in-house code) CM = +2.2879E-02 (CFX) CM = +3.3578E-02 (Fluent) CM = -8.9100E-02 (XFLR5) I don't understand why there is such a difference between Fluent's and Xflr5's results for an inviscid study. I used the same mesh for the study with CFX and Fluent. If someone can help me, it will be very appreciate. If you need more explanation, please ask me. Regards, Antoine. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The FOAM Documentation Project - SHUT-DOWN | holger_marschall | OpenFOAM | 242 | March 7, 2013 13:30 |
Debugging Unsteady 2-D Panel Method Code: Wake Modeling | RajeshAero | Main CFD Forum | 5 | November 10, 2011 06:48 |
Small 3-D code | Zdravko Stojanovic | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 19, 2010 11:11 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 13:19 |
own Code vs. commercial code | Bernhard Mueck | Main CFD Forum | 10 | February 16, 2000 11:07 |