|
[Sponsors] |
March 1, 2013, 05:41 |
Bad pressure distribution in pump
|
#1 |
New Member
Marek
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello everyone,
I use CFD to calculate radial force in cetrifugal pump. I made geometry of old "test stand" used to calculate radial force. I have data from scientific research (capacity, static pressure in inlet and outlet). I want to confront them with CFD results. My problem is I get bad results, which are not connected with scientific data, eg. force decreases with capacity lower than in BEP (0,5*Qn), so it's not physical. It looks that I get bad pressure distribution. see the pictures of model: http://www.picshot.pl/public/view/full/301733 http://www.picshot.pl/pfiles/301734/volute.jpg Blue colour are interfaces, red are rotating walls in stationary domain, purple - LE and TE. Volute geometry is very simple-similar to rectangle. When I print forces in Fluent when residuals are about 2e-3 I get eg 200N, but when my residuals are about 1e-3 the force can be twice lower. It looks that pressure distribution is not stable(?), but residuals are quite stable. Usually I can't get converge lower than 1,5e-3 for second order upwind. I used k-e, k-e realizable, k-w SST but it not helped. In inlet I use BC mass flow inlet and in outlet outflow. I tried also use pressure BC in outlet and inlet, but I didn't get capacity which I should get. I've meshed impeller domain in TurboGrid. Minimum orthogonal quality is 0,15. I made volute grid in ICEM (hexa) and it has min quality 0,45. So mesh is acceptable. Hub and inlet_and_shroud domain were made in Ansys Meshing. I tried 2 grids, bigger has about 4,5 mln nodes and it not helped. I don't know what am I supposed to do? Are my interfaces in bad position (see the pictures)? Should I place them in other place or way? Impeller diameter is 268 trailing edge diameter is 264 and tongue diameter in volute is about 290. Why I get pressure distribution completety not connected with scientific data. I'd be very grateful for help because I don't know what should I do.... BW, Marek Last edited by oringo; March 1, 2013 at 09:13. |
|
March 1, 2013, 16:42 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14 |
I think that concerning the BC it is better for inlet Velocity or mass (the same) and for outer Pressure.
|
|
March 2, 2013, 11:38 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Marek
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks for advice. I've moved interface of impeller farther into volute and now it looks better even with low quality mesh
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Neumann pressure BC and velocity field | Antech | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 25, 2006 03:15 |
pressure distribution and friction factor | Tajul | FLUENT | 2 | March 16, 2006 05:51 |
Problems of Duns Codes! | Martin J | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 15, 2003 00:19 |
pressure gradient term in low speed flow | Atit Koonsrisuk | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 10, 2002 11:52 |
Effects of gravity in pipe - pressure distribution | Anthony Wachs | FLUENT | 2 | July 25, 2001 08:07 |