STANDARD WALL FUNCTIONS vs ENHANCED WALL TREATMENT

Roby_1986 · February 22, 2013, 14:09

Hi everybody,
I'm simulating with fluent the natural ventilation in a building, so I've realized a mesh of a cubic building with a window, which is surrounded by a parallelepiped representing the external air. I've had to refine the mesh in some zones, as those close to the building walls and to the parallelepiped basis. The mesh is that of the attached image.
I've a doubt about the near-wall treatment. First I've set k-epsilon RNG with standard wall function. Setting the Yplus of the building walls and the basis of the parallelepiped (which is considered as a rough wall) I've obtained Y+ include between about zero and a 700. Now, I don't know how to proceed, becouse I should coarsen the mesh in those zones where Y+ are less than 30 and refine the mesh whare Y+ are more than 300. Is it right?
I know that Fluent can just refine the mesh and not coarsen it. So, what can I do?
Thanks a lot.
Bests

davidwilcox · February 22, 2013, 19:31

Hi,
I think you should refine the y plus in the near wall region. The manual in fluent says that too fine a y plus value for a standard wall function can deteriorate your results. They suggested a y plus value of 11.13 ( i think). That should fall in the log region in the law of the wall.
The way i would adapt my meshes in fluent is thru this way ( in the near wall region). Adapt> Yplus> specify value. Run simulation and check again.
Then i would adapt regions of high velocity gradients ( or shear layer)
Hope this helps!

cfd seeker · February 23, 2013, 03:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roby_1986

Hi everybody,
I'm simulating with fluent the natural ventilation in a building, so I've realized a mesh of a cubic building with a window, which is surrounded by a parallelepiped representing the external air. I've had to refine the mesh in some zones, as those close to the building walls and to the parallelepiped basis. The mesh is that of the attached image.
I've a doubt about the near-wall treatment. First I've set k-epsilon RNG with standard wall function. Setting the Yplus of the building walls and the basis of the parallelepiped (which is considered as a rough wall) I've obtained Y+ include between about zero and a 700. Now, I don't know how to proceed, becouse I should coarsen the mesh in those zones where Y+ are less than 30 and refine the mesh whare Y+ are more than 300. Is it right?
I know that Fluent can just refine the mesh and not coarsen it. So, what can I do?
Thanks a lot.
Bests

Use Scaleable Wall Funcitions aproach. Do a quick google search or consult Fluent's theory guide, you will learn how to activate them. Actually they prevent wall y+ to go below 30 in areas of high refinement.

Roby_1986 · February 23, 2013, 04:29

Thanks for the replies.
Sincerely, I have a doubt. I'm studying the natural ventilation in a cubic building, through the presence of a huge parallelepiped of air surrounding it.
Now, where I've to do the control of the Y+ ?
As I said, I set the basis of my parallelepiped as a rough wall (representing the ground) and the walls of the cubic building (both internal and external) as smooth walls.
The Y+ control has to be done just for confined flow, so just for the internal walls of my building, or for all the walls of the model?
Thanks a lot
Bests

macfly · February 23, 2013, 15:30

Fluent can't coarsen mesh more than its initial size. Suppose you start with a mesh, refine it in Fluent (Adapt => ...), then you can coarsen it back to its initial size, not bigger.

That said, you could start with a coarse mesh, this way you should get rid of the low y+ regions. Then you can refine the mesh in the regions where the y+ values are large. The disadvantage is that mesh refinement is costly: A hexahedron is split into 8 hexahedra and a tetrahedron is split into 8 tetrahedra.

micro11sl · February 25, 2013, 13:15

Just to remind that caution is needed when modeling surface roughness with wall functions(no matter standard or enhanced). You may have mesh restrictions. Consult the chapter of boundary condition in the user's guide for some information.

gush · October 23, 2017, 09:28

hi everyone!

it is generally explained that std wall function is best for y+>30 and enhanced wall treatment (EWT) for y+=1.

i am modeling the airflow in a very simple room now, y+ value is around 4. i decreased it to y+=1. but in any case (y+=4 or 1) standart wall function gives the best suitable velocity results with experimental data. EWT results are very different than "standart wall function" selection in any Y+ value

how can that be? i checked the literature which validated the same case for boundary conditions etc. but found nothing!

thx!

February 22, 2013, 14:09	STANDARD WALL FUNCTIONS vs ENHANCED WALL TREATMENT	#1
Roby_1986 New Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 18 Rep Power: 13	Hi everybody, I'm simulating with fluent the natural ventilation in a building, so I've realized a mesh of a cubic building with a window, which is surrounded by a parallelepiped representing the external air. I've had to refine the mesh in some zones, as those close to the building walls and to the parallelepiped basis. The mesh is that of the attached image. I've a doubt about the near-wall treatment. First I've set k-epsilon RNG with standard wall function. Setting the Yplus of the building walls and the basis of the parallelepiped (which is considered as a rough wall) I've obtained Y+ include between about zero and a 700. Now, I don't know how to proceed, becouse I should coarsen the mesh in those zones where Y+ are less than 30 and refine the mesh whare Y+ are more than 300. Is it right? I know that Fluent can just refine the mesh and not coarsen it. So, what can I do? Thanks a lot. Bests Last edited by Roby_1986; February 24, 2013 at 12:52.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
y plus and standard wall functions	spk	FLUENT	12	January 22, 2018 18:30
Enhanced Wall Treatment - Thermal Effects	Brian Tang	FLUENT	1	November 6, 2015 00:59
[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent	romekr	ANSYS Meshing & Geometry	1	November 26, 2011 13:11
standard wall functions	Irshad22	Main CFD Forum	0	December 20, 2010 07:11
Errors running allwmake in OpenFOAM141dev with WM_COMPILE_OPTION%3ddebug	unoder	OpenFOAM Installation	11	January 30, 2008 21:30

February 22, 2013, 19:31		#2
davidwilcox Senior Member david Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 142 Rep Power: 14	Hi, I think you should refine the y plus in the near wall region. The manual in fluent says that too fine a y plus value for a standard wall function can deteriorate your results. They suggested a y plus value of 11.13 ( i think). That should fall in the log region in the law of the wall. The way i would adapt my meshes in fluent is thru this way ( in the near wall region). Adapt> Yplus> specify value. Run simulation and check again. Then i would adapt regions of high velocity gradients ( or shear layer) Hope this helps!

February 23, 2013, 04:29		#4
Roby_1986 New Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 18 Rep Power: 13	Thanks for the replies. Sincerely, I have a doubt. I'm studying the natural ventilation in a cubic building, through the presence of a huge parallelepiped of air surrounding it. Now, where I've to do the control of the Y+ ? As I said, I set the basis of my parallelepiped as a rough wall (representing the ground) and the walls of the cubic building (both internal and external) as smooth walls. The Y+ control has to be done just for confined flow, so just for the internal walls of my building, or for all the walls of the model? Thanks a lot Bests

February 23, 2013, 15:30		#5
macfly Senior Member François Grégoire Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Canada Posts: 392 Rep Power: 17	Fluent can't coarsen mesh more than its initial size. Suppose you start with a mesh, refine it in Fluent (Adapt => ...), then you can coarsen it back to its initial size, not bigger. That said, you could start with a coarse mesh, this way you should get rid of the low y+ regions. Then you can refine the mesh in the regions where the y+ values are large. The disadvantage is that mesh refinement is costly: A hexahedron is split into 8 hexahedra and a tetrahedron is split into 8 tetrahedra.

February 25, 2013, 13:15		#6
micro11sl Member Sheng Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 62 Rep Power: 15	Just to remind that caution is needed when modeling surface roughness with wall functions(no matter standard or enhanced). You may have mesh restrictions. Consult the chapter of boundary condition in the user's guide for some information.

October 23, 2017, 09:28	hi	#7
gush Member yun Join Date: Jul 2015 Posts: 37 Rep Power: 11	hi everyone! it is generally explained that std wall function is best for y+>30 and enhanced wall treatment (EWT) for y+=1. i am modeling the airflow in a very simple room now, y+ value is around 4. i decreased it to y+=1. but in any case (y+=4 or 1) standart wall function gives the best suitable velocity results with experimental data. EWT results are very different than "standart wall function" selection in any Y+ value how can that be? i checked the literature which validated the same case for boundary conditions etc. but found nothing! thx!