|
[Sponsors] |
December 30, 2012, 12:25 |
Under Relaxation Factor Range
|
#1 |
New Member
Amin
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi everyone
I'm simulating mass flow distribution in micro-channel manifolds. The solution does not converge unless I change the Momentum Under Relaxation Factor. I read somewhere in this forum that we are not allowed to decrease the Momentum URF less than 0.5 But as I decrease it less than 0.5 the solution converges faster. Is it OK to reduce URF this way? I encountered an other problem too. Although the residuals are less than 1e-04, there is obvious different in mass flow rate in different number of iterations. could you please help me? Regards, Amin |
|
December 31, 2012, 00:33 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
SSL
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 226
Rep Power: 15 |
For Microchannel, first use double precision, second decrease URF of the UDF for wall slip profile. It's easy to converge it. Try more
|
|
January 6, 2013, 16:48 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
rasoul b
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: iran
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
I want to simulate turbulent channel flow with slip B.C (by LES), But the problem doesn't converge, so can you guide me for URF for momentum & pressure? if you have any other comment, please write it. Thanks |
||
January 7, 2013, 01:09 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,753
Rep Power: 66 |
You shouldn't ever touch the URF if you are doing LES since it is a transient simulation. If anything, you want to increase URF and make it ORF.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a question about relaxation control | doctor evil | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 4, 2012 04:51 |
Relaxation and convergence | sammi | Phoenics | 0 | March 20, 2008 04:32 |
relaxation parameter | rvndr | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 5, 2004 13:34 |
Question on adjusting relaxation factor | CFD Rookie | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 26, 2004 15:37 |
Relaxation factor | Moon | Siemens | 1 | June 13, 2003 12:13 |