CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Solving a problem

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 22, 2012, 16:17
Default Solving a problem
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 13
mertimiks is an unknown quantity at this point
Hello everyone. My professor assigned me a problem. Therefore, here is the problem:



Flow flows from -x to x. The simulation runs in 2d. The dimension are indicated above. The grid size = 0.5 cm. There are five parts on this geometry which were INLET (the left side), OUTLET (the right side), WALL (the top and bottom sides), FLUID, and SQUARE (the geometric shape in the middle)

Fluent Setup:
General: The simulation was started as steady first, and after 20 iterations it was run as transient.
Models: Laminar flow, since the Reynolds number was 5000.
Materials: Water
Boundary Conditions: WALL and SQUARE were set as wall. INLET was set as velocity-inlet. The OUTLET was set as pressure-outlet.
Monitors: Residual Monitors: Residual Criteria was set to 10E-6.
Solution Methods: Transient Formulation first was set as Order Implicit, then was set as Second Order Implicit.
Run Calculation: Time Step Size was set as 0.01. Number of Time Steps were set as 100. Reporting Interval was set as 0.2. Max Iterations were set as 5000.
The rest of the results were set as default.

This is the residual plot that I received.



The vector plot that I was received.



As it can be seen from the vector plot, there was no wake behind the square. This proves that result is not valid. Therefore, could you help me to get a better result on this assignment? Thanks.

mertimiks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2012, 17:54
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Trần Đình Thắng
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Moscow Russia, Hanoi Vietnam
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 14
mp121209 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to mp121209 Send a message via Yahoo to mp121209 Send a message via Skype™ to mp121209
As I think, you had mainly a problem with the computational grid. The computational cell size is too large (0.5 cm), it must be at least in 10 times smaller, especially in the region near to the wall surface.
mp121209 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2012, 18:37
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 13
mertimiks is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by mp121209 View Post
As I think, you had mainly a problem with the computational grid. The computational cell size is too large (0.5 cm), it must be at least in 10 times smaller, especially in the region near to the wall surface.

My prof. said that grid resolutions are fine.
mertimiks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
transsonic nozzle with rhoSimpleFoam Unseen OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 July 1, 2022 07:54
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 07:20
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 16:33
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 25, 2008 21:21
Modeling in micron scale using icoFoam m9819348 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 October 27, 2007 01:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26.