|
[Sponsors] |
September 12, 2012, 16:48 |
Equivalent porous jump condition
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello Everybody,
I have two porous surfaces - one on top of another with a certain small distance between them. One of them is horizontal with a certain porosity while another is inclined with another porosity. I would like to use a single porous jump condition for modeling both surfaces with no gap between them. I was wondering if there was any way of combining the two porous surfaces into an equivaluent surface. For modeling in FLUENT this becomes a two part question, I believe: 1. How can the equivalency with respest to geometry be established? and 2. How can the pressure drop vs. velocity correlation be combined? I hope I have been clear with my intended calculations but please let me know if further clarifications are needed. I think that there should be a method of doing this, as I think that this is an oft encountered problem. Thanks in advance for your suggestions. |
|
September 13, 2012, 14:51 |
Re:
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi mali28,
Thanks for your reply and the links. While these links are useful, my question is more about using a single equivalent porous jump condition to simulate two porous surfaces separated by a small distance. In other words, how can we model the geometry and pressure drop correlation, if we have two porous surfaces stacked on each other, with a single porous jump condition in FLUENT? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Porous Jump Error | Akim679 | FLUENT | 0 | March 18, 2012 12:55 |
Physical significance of porous jump coefficient | ulalala | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 16, 2010 03:45 |
Porous jump boundary condition & convergence | Häwimeddel | FLUENT | 1 | October 8, 2009 22:55 |
porous jump boundary conditions? | RS | FLUENT | 2 | May 13, 2007 19:24 |
Testing the integrity of POROUS media and por jump | Azman | FLUENT | 0 | July 31, 2006 12:11 |