CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Producing a supersonic flow in a constant diameter cylinder

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 24, 2012, 01:43
Default Producing a supersonic flow in a constant diameter cylinder
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 14
clgs.1903 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am trying to analyse the effect of a shock wave around a blunt body, by inducing a Mach 2 flow at the entry of a cylinder, which then flows past a sphere and then out the outlet. The cylinder has a constant diameter.

I had assumed I could produce this flow by altering the pressure boundary conditions, however I cannot get anything close to a Mach 2 flow to occur.

The fluid properties I defined were:
density = perfect gas relation
Cp = 1.6565 J/kg-K
Mwt = 17567.5 Kg/Kmol
viscosity = 0.5 Pa s

If my calculations are correct, this should result in a speed of sound of:
a = (kRT)^(1/2) = 50 m/s at T = 100 K.

I defined the inlet boundary condition as a pressure inlet with
Total pressure = 1951.252 Pa
Supersonic pressure = 249.37 Pa
which should give a density of 1 kg/m^3 at the inlet, from perfect gas law,
and thus an inlet velocity of 100 m/s.

I set the outlet boundary condition to a pressure outlet with P = 1000 Pa, as I am assuming a drop in pressure over the shock wave.

However, I end up with flow in the order of 1 m/s and no shock wave forming. I'm assuming that I've midunderstood how to use the boundary conditions, but this is the only way that it makes sense to me. If anyone has any ideas I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks in advance

TL,DR - What boundary conditions should I set in a constant diameter cylinder to produce a supersonic flow around a blunt body within the cylinder?
clgs.1903 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 04:00
Default
  #2
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
I defined the inlet boundary condition as a pressure inlet with
Total pressure = 1951.252 Pa
Supersonic pressure = 249.37 Pa
which should give a density of 1 kg/m^3 at the inlet, from perfect gas law,
and thus an inlet velocity of 100 m/s.
You should go for the pressure far field boundary.

Quote:
I set the outlet boundary condition to a pressure outlet with P = 1000 Pa, as I am assuming a drop in pressure over the shock wave.
This should happen inside (local) the domain and should not propagate at outlet boundary. so at outlet you should define the 101325 and operating pressure zero.


Can you give details about the courant number, flow scheme , gradient option etc. Also post some pics of geometry, mesh and results obtained so far.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 06:54
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 14
clgs.1903 is on a distinguished road
Hi Far, thanks for your reply!



This is a picture of my mesh and geometry. The sphere is 1 metre in diameter, the cylinder 20 metres in diameter, and 45 metres long.

I'm using the density based solver, with the energy equation switched on. I've left the Courant number and other solver properties at their default values for now (I'm just trying to get an idea of how to get it to solve).

I tried implementing your suggestions. I set the inlet to be a far field pressure boundary with a Mach number of 2 and a supersonic pressure of 250 Pa. The outlet I set to be a pressure outlet of 0 Pa.

I wasn't sure what to set for initialization values, but I tried leaving the pressure and velocity as 0 and the temperature as 100 K (same as the inlet). However this caused the solver to complain about Temperature gradients being too large. Setting the initialization velocity to 100 m/s resulted in divergence. So... I don't really have any results at this stage!

Any more thoughts?
clgs.1903 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 07:12
Default
  #4
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
make the outer wall as slip (specified shear with zero values). use the hybrid initialization and solution steering with very low courant number.

You are using inviscid solver?

http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/mai...nvergence.html

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...ug/node840.htm


http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...nvergence.html

Not directly related but may be useful.
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...sst-model.html
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 07:22
Default
  #5
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
I assume that the sphere is placed in the free stream. Correct me if it is wrong supposition.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 09:01
Default
  #6
Member
 
James Willie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 17
jwillie2000 is on a distinguished road
How did you compute the speed of sound? Specifically, what value did you use for R? Your value for the speed of sound is too small given the values you have. Jimmy
jwillie2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 11:45
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 14
clgs.1903 is on a distinguished road
Far,
I'm using the inviscid solver, and yes the sphere is in the free stream. I'll give your suggestions a go tomorrow, thanks


Jimmy,
You're completely right, I made an error in my calculations of the molecular weight. I went over them several times and missed my mistake every time. They should be:
  • density = perfect gas relation
  • Cp = 0.625 J/kg-K
  • Mwt = 46561 Kg/Kmol
  • k = 1.4
  • R = 0.17857 J/kg-K
  • a = (kRT)^(1/2) = 5 m/s at T = 100 K.
  • Supersonic pressure at inlet = 17.857 Pa
  • which should give a density of 1 kg/m^3 at the inlet
  • and thus an inlet velocity of 10 m/s for Mach 2 flow
I'll try the new values out tomorrow, see if that makes a difference. Thank you so much! And sorry for making such a silly mistake.
clgs.1903 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 11:58
Default
  #8
Member
 
James Willie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 17
jwillie2000 is on a distinguished road
May be i should have put my question this way the first time. It would be nice I know the material you are looking at? I seem to be missing this info. Is it air or what?
jwillie2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 12:23
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 14
clgs.1903 is on a distinguished road
It's not any fluid in particular, I'm just tweaking the values to get the flow conditions I want, in terms of the Mach and Reynolds numbers.
clgs.1903 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 13:04
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 14
clgs.1903 is on a distinguished road
I decided I didn't want to wait to try it, haha. I used the correct values, the pressure far field inlet, and the pressure outlet of 0 Pa. I set the Courant number to 0.1 and used Hybrid Initialisation with the "Use Specified Initial Pressure on Intlets" command selected. And...

Success!!!



This image is of the velocity vectors coloured by Mach number, in a plane parallel to the flow. The majority of the flow is at Mach 2 with just a small area around the sphere affected.

Thank you both so much for your help, hopefully I can progress a lot faster now that this problem has been figured out
clgs.1903 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 13:17
Default
  #11
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
are you interested in boundary layer as well? what about vortex shedding? What's the Reynolds number.

These question are just for my knowledge and not related to your queries.


could you please post the Mach no. contour plot?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 13:19
Default
  #12
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Flow is steady state or transient?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2012, 14:41
Default
  #13
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 14
clgs.1903 is on a distinguished road
The flow is transient, and I'm not interested in boundary flow or vortex shedding at this point. It's more of a test to see what can be done. Not sure on the Reynolds number, looks to be about 30000, but I'm not sure. I'll upload the contour plot when I get a chance
clgs.1903 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
blunt body, boundary conditions, constant diameter, supersonic


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 06:21
back pressure at exit for supersonic flow BigFrank FLUENT 6 April 24, 2014 16:13
Particle deposition on circular cylinder in turbulent flow Julian K. CFX 1 October 3, 2011 18:51
Importance of Hydraulic Diameter Value for Compressible Flow RyGuy FLUENT 0 August 6, 2009 11:58
Turbulent steady flow around a circular cylinder Mirek Kabacinski FLUENT 0 July 23, 2003 19:40


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05.