|
[Sponsors] |
May 16, 2011, 18:21 |
Problem with 6DOF udf
|
#1 |
New Member
Rafael Oliveira
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello, everybody!
I've been trying make a simulation, using the 6DOF udf, putting obstacle in the shape of circle ( each one with your udf) in a canal and allow them to have the freedom to rotate around its axis of symmetry. Everything was fine, however now that I added more a few obstacles, the following error appear: Stack backtrace generated for process id 18775 on signal 1 : /ansys_inc/v130/fluent/fluent13.0.0/lnamd64/2ddp/fluent.13.0.0[0x12afebd] /ansys_inc/v130/fluent/fluent13.0.0/lnamd64/2ddp/fluent.13.0.0[0x12b04e3] /lib/libpthread.so.0[0x31d360ea80] /ansys_inc/v130/fluent/fluent13.0.0/lnamd64/2ddp/fluent.13.0.0(c3+0x0)[0x1ad3b68] Check the file fluenterror.log for details. ================================================== ============= Error: fluent.13.0.0 received a fatal signal (SEGMENTATION VIOLATION). I realized that the error appears only with some UDFs (e.g., with the obstacle c3), but don't understand why, they are equal. Does anyone have any ideas? |
|
May 17, 2011, 09:40 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Rafael Oliveira
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16 |
I don't understand, but I changed the name of udf and the problem was resolved. I think is a bug of fluent.
|
|
August 9, 2014, 11:39 |
|
#3 |
New Member
arash
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi everyone
I have been working on moving projectile in barrel. I need udf for dynamic mesh(Six degree of freedom solver). can anyone help me? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATTN ALL: SOLUTON TO UDF COMPILE PROBLEM | Rizwan | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 40 | March 18, 2018 07:05 |
what's the problem with my udf | zzyan | FLUENT | 0 | November 4, 2010 04:56 |
Problem with my udf | july | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 3 | June 20, 2010 07:56 |
udf compiling problem | akr | FLUENT | 3 | August 22, 2007 08:14 |
UDF problem | chiseung | FLUENT | 4 | January 10, 2002 10:58 |