CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT > Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming

there is a problem with fully developed Nusselt number

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 25, 2011, 16:29
Default there is a problem with fully developed Nusselt number
  #1
New Member
 
iman mohammadi
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 16
eeman is on a distinguished road
Dear all

as you know, Nusselt number for a fully developed laminar flow
in parallel palates should be 7.54 and for example, for kn=0.1 should be 4.75. I have the correct answer for Nusselt number when there is no slip region, but for slip-flow my Nusselt numbers are wrong.
I've checked also slip- flow and heat transfer in rectangular microchannels but as same as parallel plates for the slip region fully developed Nusselt number are wrong but temperature profile is correct.
It seems to be all correct except Nusselt number.


i would appreciate for any help.

Last edited by eeman; April 26, 2011 at 19:44.
eeman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2012, 05:14
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Learner
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ingolstadt
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 15
raghu.tejaswi is on a distinguished road
I am not sure eeman, but the Nusselt number in FLUENT is always wrong for me. It is always very high. I am really not sure how this is evaluated. Also the HTC at the surface. I dont understand what is the T_ref FLUENT considers to calculate HTC and what is the Nusselt number.
raghu.tejaswi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2012, 03:48
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Patrick
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 14
Patrick1 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by eeman View Post
Dear all

as you know, Nusselt number for a fully developed laminar flow
in parallel palates should be 7.54 and for example, for kn=0.1 should be 4.75. I have the correct answer for Nusselt number when there is no slip region, but for slip-flow my Nusselt numbers are wrong.
I've checked also slip- flow and heat transfer in rectangular microchannels but as same as parallel plates for the slip region fully developed Nusselt number are wrong but temperature profile is correct.
It seems to be all correct except Nusselt number.


i would appreciate for any help.
Did you try and calculate the Nusselt number yourself from the flow data?
Patrick1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2012, 01:36
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
shahvar is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick1 View Post
Did you try and calculate the Nusselt number yourself from the flow data?
how can calculate nusselt number by fluent data?
shahvar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2012, 02:36
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Learner
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ingolstadt
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 15
raghu.tejaswi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick1 View Post
Did you try and calculate the Nusselt number yourself from the flow data?
Patrick, when you say flow data, do you mean analytically with formulae???
raghu.tejaswi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[mesh manipulation] Mesh Refinement Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 42 January 8, 2017 13:55
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 24 June 27, 2016 09:54
Nusselt number? tash FLUENT 13 March 9, 2013 16:32
Airfoil Average Nusselt Number calculation y2k_o__o FLUENT 6 March 3, 2011 08:37
Help with UDF - nusselt number Sammie FLUENT 0 October 24, 2007 08:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21.