|
[Sponsors] |
How to change the turbulent viscosity via UDF!? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 29, 2009, 13:17 |
|
#21 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
First see if you get the right values from C_WALL_DIST macro. If not, then it is rather simple to write your own udf that computes this distance using the BOUNDARY_FACE_GEOMETRY macro.
Dragos |
|
October 29, 2009, 13:21 |
|
#22 |
New Member
Vivek Sampath
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks a lot.....
I tried the C_WALL_DIST.... the udf compiles but when initaliasing it shows error....... I will try with the Boundary_FACE_geometry..... where can i find an example on how to use that?? |
|
October 29, 2009, 13:46 |
|
#23 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
I wouldn't give up using C_WALL_DIST macro. What error do you get? Could you post your udf? There is an error in your previous posted code.
Try first your code changing the line: Code:
y=C_WALL_DIST(c,t); Code:
y=C_WALL_DIST(cell,thread); However, here is an untested example of how to compute it your self (should be valid for Gina, too): Code:
real wallDist(cell_t c, Thread *t) { real A[ND_ND], es[ND_ND], dr0[ND_ND]; real ds, A_by_es; real y; int n; face_t f; Thread *tf; c_face_loop(c, t, n) /* loops over all faces of a cell */ { f = C_FACE(c,t,n); tf = C_FACE_THREAD(c,t,n); if(BOUNDARY_FACE_P(tf)) /* if the face is on boundary */ { BOUNDARY_FACE_GEOMETRY(f,tf,A,ds,es,A_by_es,dr0); y = NV_DOT(es,dr0); return y; } } return 0; } |
|
November 1, 2009, 16:04 |
|
#24 |
Member
gina
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Vivek,
can you find any solution for your udf? for me, I could not turn it to have good results |
|
November 1, 2009, 16:36 |
|
#25 |
Member
gina
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 17 |
there is someone who can help me?
I would like to know whether a UDF turbulent viscosity permits me to provide a turbulent viscosity profile where the turbulent visosity is a function of wall normal distance y. I know that, i must calculate the wall normal distance and define turbulent viscosity as a function of the distance. but how to do this?? I AM NEW IN UDF ALSO IN C PROGRAMATION..... please i need some help |
|
November 2, 2009, 01:46 |
|
#26 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
Hi Gina,
I think your approach should work if you are using a low Re turbulence model (meaning without wall functions). Did you check if the C_WALL_DIST gives you the right values? Dragos |
|
November 2, 2009, 16:31 |
|
#27 |
Member
gina
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 17 |
hi Dragos,
I use k-e model with enhanced wall treatment. my Reynolds number= 5400. Gina |
|
November 2, 2009, 18:28 |
|
#28 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
Do you have enough resolution near the wall? If you don't then enhanced wall treatment will apply a wall function and your back to what Krishna said before.
If the resolution is enough then what is the error you are complaining about? Have you checked the C_WALL_DISTANCE macro if it provides the right value? You can also attach a debugger to your udf and follow it step by step. There is an example on wiki describing how to do this (http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Fluen..._udf_using_gdb). Dragos |
|
November 3, 2009, 14:05 |
|
#29 |
Member
gina
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 17 |
dear dragos,
yes i have enough resolution near the wall. no i have not checked the C_WALL_DISTANCE macro if it provides right value, how to do this? the objective of my udf is to improved the nu_t formula in the near wall region when y_plus<=20. can you send me your mail @ to explain better what i want to to thank you gina |
|
March 30, 2016, 15:29 |
|
#30 | |
New Member
Pratik Dhoot
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
If you have used a centroid macro or any other method, please share. I am struggling with this too. |
||
April 15, 2016, 18:57 |
|
#31 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
Quote:
|
||
April 18, 2016, 11:33 |
|
#32 |
New Member
Pratik Dhoot
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 10 |
||
January 17, 2017, 15:31 |
|
#33 | |
New Member
Ekta J
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
I am using the following udf (modified as per my knowledge, from the basic udf for k-epsilon mixture model) But it does not seem to be taking the correct value of k, epsilon etc from the fluent: " #include "udf.h" DEFINE_TURBULENT_VISCOSITY(mu_t_ke_air,c,t) { real rho_g, KE_g, D_g, mu_t_g; rho_g = C_R(c, t); /* gas phase density */ KE_g = C_K(c, t); /* gas phase Kinetic energy */ D_g = C_D(c, t); /* gas phase epsilon */ mu_t_g= 0.09*rho_g*KE_g*KE_g/D_g; C_UDMI(c,t,2) = mu_t_g; // (Calculated above) return mu_t_g; } " |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
turbulent viscosity in k-e model | orlik | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | July 19, 2017 13:27 |
wrong results after use UDF turbulent viscosity | lehoanganh07 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | July 21, 2014 12:12 |
hel (turbulent viscosity ratio limited) for supersonic combustion problem | omar.2002bh | FLUENT | 2 | September 5, 2012 12:04 |
Turbulent viscosity and shear rate | shib | FLUENT | 0 | June 22, 2010 13:44 |
effective? turbulent? laminar? viscosity | MIssNancy | FLUENT | 3 | December 3, 2002 00:53 |