|
[Sponsors] |
defining angular velocity of an external gear pump |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 19, 2020, 10:53 |
defining angular velocity of an external gear pump
|
#1 |
New Member
Me_1989
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello,
I've recently tried to simulate an external gear pump ( with two gears) and used a "DEFINE_CG_MOTION" code for defining the angular velocity of the gears. I solved all the code errors and I could see the rotation of the gears in the dynamic mesh preview. But, when I change the rotation speed to see its effect on the inlet mass flow rate ( any changes in the rotation speed of the gears must result in the changes of the input mass flow rate), I could not see any effects in the result. I mean with all of the rotation speeds, I have a constant amount of mass flow rate which is absolutely wrong!! Thus, I would be so thankful if anybody could have any suggestions enabled me to solve this issue. Kind Regards |
|
June 19, 2020, 10:58 |
Boundary Conditions
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
What conditions are you using at the boundaries?
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
June 19, 2020, 11:06 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Me_1989
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 6 |
I use Pressure Inlet and Pressure outlet. Also wall for the outer case and the gears as a solid. The model is 2-D and I also use K-e turbulence model and there is nothing else. In case of dynamic mesh, I use two rigid body for defining the upper and lower gears and also the stationary one for the case of the pump.
|
|
June 19, 2020, 11:09 |
Rotation Speed
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Try with very low rotational speed. The fact is that the flow might be pressure driven and not pump driven. If you get same flow rate even with almost nil rotation speed, then that's what is happening.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
June 19, 2020, 11:15 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Me_1989
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 6 |
Good suggestion. But, actually yes, that's true since we use this external gear pump as a turbine on a high pressure line. The problem is that in the experiments, we record different mass flow rate in different input pressures and so we have different rotation speed!
|
|
June 19, 2020, 11:24 |
Turbine
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Then you should simulate it as a turbine; you may use 1DOF for that. And it will certainly show different speeds at different flow rates.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
June 19, 2020, 11:58 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Me_1989
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 6 |
How could I use 1DOF? should I use it from boundary conditions to add rotational moving wall? or you mean I have to add something in UDF code of "Define-CG-Motion"?
Would you please just extend your explanation a little bit? |
|
June 19, 2020, 12:29 |
1dof
|
#8 |
Senior Member
|
You have to enable 6DOF under Dynamic Mesh and then you can constrain it to 1D rotation within 6DOF settings. No UDF is needed.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
June 19, 2020, 12:32 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Me_1989
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 6 |
I will try it for sure. Thanks a bunch dear Vinerm.
Best Regards |
|
August 8, 2020, 21:05 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Me_1989
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 6 |
Dear Vinerm,
Do you mind if I have another question in this regard? I try 1DOF rotation but I faces some warnings and so there is no motion in the preview. The warning is: "Warning: unable to read motion history file". I think the problem is that I have to define the gears (driver and driven) as a solid zone in Gambit. To do so, I defined 3 face comprising Driver gear, Driven gear and the interior region where the fluid flows between the gears as you could see in the image attached. Since the fluid behavior is important for me, I just meshed the region between gears without meshing the inner area of the gears. At last, I defined one fluid zone and two solid zone. I did just like this but when I import the mesh file to Fluent, there is no gears in boundary condition. In other word, the Fluent named them as wall. So, I would be really grateful if I have your recommendation for this problem? <> Thank you again Regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Size of Inlet and Outlet for an External Gear Pump | interawe | FLUENT | 0 | April 14, 2009 18:46 |
External Gear Pump | interawe | FLUENT | 0 | April 3, 2009 03:06 |
external gear pump with fluent | Pietro Ghillani | FLUENT | 3 | March 18, 2009 09:48 |
3D External Gear Pump | Mustafa Ayad | FLUENT | 1 | January 26, 2009 10:55 |
C.G of Gear Pump | Mustafa Ayad | FLUENT | 0 | January 23, 2009 15:53 |