|
[Sponsors] |
UDF Outputs dont match exactly for volumetric heat generation. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 31, 2015, 11:19 |
UDF Outputs dont match exactly for volumetric heat generation.
|
#1 |
Senior Member
nm
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 13 |
I checked and crosschecked and backcalculated and everything.
I have a volumetric heat generation rate set as a function of coordinates. If I manually calculate the numbers (which I have set in the udf) I get say 10kW exact. But when it comes to udf, the total volume integral is only 9500W. The contour plot makes sense. Heat balance is exact. But the 500W difference? Anybody? |
|
January 2, 2016, 18:38 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
Are you calculating heat generation at the nodes or cell centres? What is the UDF you are using to calculate the volume integral?
|
|
May 23, 2016, 09:55 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
nm
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 13 |
Based on cell centres.
I have come to the conclusive assumption that this is the discretization error from the mesh? |
|
May 23, 2016, 18:41 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
The mesh would need to be quite coarse to be missing 5 % of the heat generation (try mesh refinement). What is the UDF you are using, are you sure it's calculating across the full volume?
|
|
Tags |
fluent 14.5.7 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Define_profile UDF for Transient Heat flux boundary condition | Amoljoshi | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 2 | June 20, 2018 22:55 |
variable Heat Source for Solid Region with UDF | Alex90 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 3 | February 24, 2015 12:24 |
use of pointers in specific heat udf | mdakbari | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | April 18, 2014 12:37 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |
heat source UDF error | co2 | FLUENT | 8 | May 18, 2004 08:47 |