|
[Sponsors] |
FLUENT received fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 7, 2014, 06:11 |
FLUENT received fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION)
|
#1 |
Member
Ebrahim
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi dear all
I have written the UDF as follows for determination of viscose resistance as a function of second phase volume fraction in each cell. when I interpreted it to the fluent it is okay but when I want to run (after initialization) the fluent gives this error: FLUENT received fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION) I was wondering if you know what is wrong with it? #include "udf.h" DEFINE_ADJUST(viscouse_function, d) { real visc; cell_t cell; Thread **pt; Thread *cell_threads; Domain *mixture_domain; mp_thread_loop_c(cell_threads, mixture_domain, pt) { begin_c_loop(cell,pt[1]) { visc = 1- ((0.95-(C_VOF(cell,pt[1])))-0.25); } end_c_loop(cell,pt[1]) } } |
|
September 8, 2014, 12:24 |
|
#2 |
Member
Ebrahim
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 12 |
When I interpreted The UDF to fluent it says:
mixture_domain definition shadows previous definition What does that means? |
|
December 23, 2014, 08:24 |
received fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION)
|
#3 |
New Member
Cristian SIC
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
I get this error too, Not enough Ram memory can be a cause.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FLUENT received fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION) | CHAKER | FLUENT | 4 | December 11, 2015 04:20 |
FLUENT received fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION) | Mike Wong | FLUENT | 7 | October 17, 2014 14:17 |
FLUENT received fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION) | rubis | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | April 22, 2014 16:42 |
fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION) | manu | FLUENT | 0 | December 10, 2007 07:10 |
FLUENT received fatal signal (ACCESS_VIOLATION) | samy | FLUENT | 0 | November 10, 2007 14:09 |