|
[Sponsors] |
April 3, 2014, 00:00 |
Questions about the energy equation
|
#1 |
Member
Peter Aestas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 13 |
Dear all, i got two problems
1.in fluent6.3 help manual, i saw the energy equation form like this in the picture,so my question is, does that means i should make the energy equation(take temperature as an argument) into this form(take E as an argument) ,then use UDF to define the source and diffusivity term? 2.A friend of me said, if the energy equation is used in fluent, fluent will take pressure and kinetic energy effect term into consideration automatically,so i don't need to write the pressure and kinetic energy effect term of momentum equation into my udf.Does that true?Where can i find the proof? Thank you so much~ 111.jpg |
|
April 4, 2014, 16:52 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
From Fluent Theory Guide 15.0:
5.2.1.4. Inclusion of Pressure Work and Kinetic Energy Terms Equation 5.1 (p. 134) includes pressure work and kinetic energy terms, which are often negligible in incompressible flows. For this reason, the pressure-based solver by default does not include the pressure work or kinetic energy when you are solving incompressible flow. If you want to include these terms, use the define/models/energy? text command. When asked to include pressure work in energy equation? and include kinetic energy in energy equation?, respond by entering yes in the console window. Pressure work and kinetic energy are always accounted for when you are modeling compressible flow or using the density-based solver. |
|
April 5, 2014, 06:24 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Peter Aestas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
|
||
April 5, 2014, 11:17 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
I'm not sure to understand what you want to do, add a source term to the momentum equation? Then you write whatever source term you want to add to the momentum eqn, you don't have to 'handle' anything. The pressure term in the momentum is there and, in my limited experience in fluid mechanics, I've never heard of a case where this term is not included, it sounds unphysical to me, there has to be a pressure gradient so that the fluid moves.
|
|
April 5, 2014, 22:05 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Peter Aestas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
My momentum equation is like this below,the argument u and Ti are velocity and temperature for ions, and Te are temperature for electrons(i defined plasma as single fluid of ions.So Te is defined as UDS). the right side of this equation is the source term of momentum, and according to P=nkT,the first -▽(nikTi) is the -grad P. Someone told me, if the energy equation is used in fluent. Fluent will take -grad P term of momentum equation into consideration, so i only need to put the last two terms -▽(nekTe)+jx(Bself+Bad) into DEFINE_SOURCE marco. I don't know whether this is ture or not. 2222.jpg |
||
April 6, 2014, 12:28 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
Sorry, I know next to nothing in electrons/ions transport, I can't help. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solving the total energy equation | dohnie | OpenFOAM | 21 | June 13, 2014 01:44 |
energy equation for porousSimpleFoam | m5m5kh | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | September 4, 2013 11:46 |
energy equation in rhoCentralFoam | nakul | OpenFOAM | 0 | October 10, 2010 16:07 |
How to discretize of energy equation ?? | Asghari | FLUENT | 0 | October 12, 2006 09:09 |
How to discretize of energy equation ?? | Asghari | FLUENT | 0 | October 12, 2006 09:06 |