|
[Sponsors] |
Re: Magnetic field around a current carrying square bar |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 28, 2014, 08:53 |
Re: Magnetic field around a current carrying square bar
|
#1 |
Member
Yash Ganatra
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
I am working on the aforementioned problem in ANSYS FLUENT. The aim is to validate this case by implementing UDS - 3 equations for magnetic vector potential and 1 for electric scalar potential. Approach: I have modelled the conductor as a box and made an enclosure around it. For the V(electric scalar pot) equation I need to define 2 separate electrical conductivity - one for air and for copper. I have defined both of these as fluids and unchecked the flow equation option. Problem: 1. I have tried to do it using Define_Diffusivity UDF and Thread_ID, but the problem is that the conducitivity for copper is not being taken into account. It should be taken as 2700 but I am not able to comprehend why it is being taken as 85. 2. While giving the boundary conditions, FLUENT is slitting the conductor up and down walls into coupled walls and I am getting confused on how to give the boundary condition - I need to give 670 V on conductor_up and 0 V on conductor_down. How should I apply the boundary conditions 3. When I model the copper bar as solid, and solve the UDS over all zones, while initializing I am getting Unknown UDS property method error. What does this mean? Also could someone kindly tell what does "coupled wall" mean? 4. Lastly, I would like to ask does zero normal gradient of field imply that the flux is zero? I am attaching the UDF I have written, boundary conditions to be applied and a the plot of diffusion coeff of V to highlight my problem. Any help would be really appreciated. Thank you, Regards, Yash Ganatra |
|
March 13, 2014, 08:51 |
|
#2 |
Member
Peter Aestas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 13 |
Dear friend yashganatra,
i haven't read over the thesis you list to me yet, but here i have some opinion and advice about your problem,you can think about it. 1.In the UDF, you used "C_UDSI_G" macros in the source term,but you have to know, when fluent compute for the first step, there isn't any gradients.So if C_UDSI_G was called in the first step of iteration, an error may occur. in my UDF, i usually put C_UDMI and C_UDSI_G in ADJUST macro, and call them when one or two steps of iteration were done. 2.You said you have defined both of air and copper as fluids, i doubt that, shouldnot copper be taken as solids? 3.If i were you, i would choose another software(like ansys or ansoft) to do electromagnetic field problem like this,and if you need to couple electromagnetic field with thermal or flow field ,you can import the result to fluent. In my case of plasma arc, i define V and A in fluent,and just set V in the UDS terms in boundary condition panel.And i haven't met a case(couple air and copper) like this.May my advice will help you.And I will be glad to discuss with you. |
|
January 11, 2019, 15:47 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
vektor
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
i read your reply and the last part got my interest, you said you've succesfully done the electric arc simulation in fluent, and i am currently trying to do the same thing, i have the UDFs for the Temperature dependent material properties, But my issue is; in the MHD_module i cannot define the electric current/current density. and that's a known issue in this module, so i read some papers and i've seen most people import magnetic flux density into fluent using UDFs, i have succesfully solved for time dependent magnetic flux density and have it in a text file with each mesh node and time step. but the problem is i couldn't find a way to import this to fluent, especially since it is time and space dependent, i would really appreciate it if you could tell me how it can be done. thanks very much |
||
March 6, 2020, 07:11 |
|
#4 |
New Member
h.sanaei
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi, guys. I need to write an UDF for volumetric heat production in a 3D problem. The heat source strength is a say Exponential function of say X coordinate, e.g. q_dot=3*10000000*e^(-10(x+0.2)) W/m^3. Please help me. Thank you.
|
|
March 6, 2020, 08:12 |
Source UDF
|
#5 |
Senior Member
|
That would be straightforward. Please look at
https://www.afs.enea.it/project/nept...udf/node49.htm You need to use C_CENTROID to fetch cell center coordinates and then use the equation.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
March 6, 2020, 08:35 |
|
#6 |
New Member
h.sanaei
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7 |
thanks vinerm. can u help me. and send udf for me? plz
|
|
March 6, 2020, 08:44 |
UDF File
|
#7 |
Senior Member
|
The UDF is written in the link I sent. You need to copy it manually, i.e., type it yourself instead of using copy and paste. Then you can interpret or compile (if you have compiler available).
I do not have any UDF file available with me. But you can certainly get help if you start doing it yourself.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
August 3, 2022, 08:13 |
|
#8 | |
Member
sina
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
How can i change UDS boundary value in a Define Adjust UDF? i mean how can i call UDS boundary value to changing in a UDF of Define Adjust? Regards, |
||
Tags |
boundary condition, fluent - udf, magnetic field, uds diffusive |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
particles in a localized magnetic field | Arturo Ortiz | FLUENT | 1 | March 10, 2010 11:26 |
magnetic field, workbench | alireza ramezani | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 13, 2008 15:42 |
ACCESS VIOLATION | MHDWill | FLUENT | 1 | September 23, 2007 03:51 |
where to find velocity field for square pipes??? | enrico | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 4, 2005 12:32 |
Divergence Free on the Magnetic Field | Valdemir | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 19, 2003 19:33 |