|
[Sponsors] |
February 12, 2014, 10:33 |
The difference between these equations for Dynamic Pitching?
|
#1 |
New Member
Musa
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
I'm attempting to analyze a 2D airfoil in a pitching motion. However I have seen so many UDF defining the pitching motion like these...
/* define motion variables */ pitchampl = 45 * pi / 180; /* 45-degree pitch amplitude */ w = 2 * pi * 25; /* 25 Hz frequency */ /* define airfoil motion */ (1) omega[2] = w * pitchampl * cos(w * time); (2) omega[2] = w * pitchampl * sin(w * time); I have also seen this equation (3) omega[2] = 0.5 * pitchampl * sin(w*time); Please I need help with the difference between these equations(1,2 and 3), which is the correct one for pitching motion of airfoil ? Is it sin or cos ? Thanks Last edited by fkanyako; February 14, 2014 at 13:14. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh and cyclic boundaries | Ruli | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | December 9, 2013 07:51 |
Periodic Boundary Condition for upwind difference | yohey44 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 27, 2010 14:10 |
[General] paraview - plotting difference to reference data | joewe | ParaView | 0 | August 30, 2010 19:01 |
the effect of upwind difference | hades | Main CFD Forum | 8 | March 15, 2009 00:43 |
Fininte difference and Finite element Technique | Mahendra Singh Mehra | FLUENT | 3 | December 23, 2005 00:49 |