|
[Sponsors] |
February 10, 2014, 11:02 |
DEFINE_UDS_FLUX in Parallel mode
|
#1 |
New Member
Rafael Cerqueira
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello,
I'm currently trying to parallelize a UDF code that contains a UDS transport. For my case I need to define the flux, the transient and the diffusion terms of the equation. When I was running in serial mode, everything went perfect, but now I having a huge problem. The case comparison between the serial and parallel results generate discrepancies next to the cell partitions boundaries, as seen in the picture in the end of the post. I already noted that the problem is in the DEFINE_UDS_FLUX macro. When I make an analysis between the serial and parallel results, using the mass flow rate for the UDS flux, the results are the same. Does anyone already came across with a similar problem or parallelized and UDS? If yes, I post the part of my code that's giving me trouble. Thanks, Rafael Cerqueira. |
|
January 27, 2015, 11:26 |
|
#2 |
New Member
A
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: France
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello,
Did you figure out the problem? I think I might have a similar problem when I will parallelize my UDF. Thanks, Akshay |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simpleFoam parallel | AndrewMortimer | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | August 7, 2015 19:45 |
Fluent Parallel Mode | Dinocrack | FLUENT | 0 | May 16, 2011 08:26 |
Grid Check Fails in Parallel Processing Mode | askance | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 20, 2010 11:11 |
DPM model in parallel batch mode | Prashanth | FLUENT | 2 | March 6, 2009 08:54 |
parallel mode - small problem? | co2 | FLUENT | 2 | June 2, 2004 00:47 |