 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
Difference of result betn Fluent & CFX simulation for S2S radiation |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 6, 2012, 01:35
|
Difference of result betn Fluent & CFX simulation for S2S radiation
|
#1 |
|
New Member
nikhil
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15  |
Hello,
i am simulating two co-axial cylinder having same length and two end with adiabatic condition for surface to surface radiation model. when i done the above case in fluent by considering S2S model im geting radiation heat from outer to inner surface 650 W and for the same case which was done in CFX by using monte carlo S2S model, i got radiative heat as 595 W. By theoretical calculation i got result of 594.5 W means it is close to CFX result. So,My query is why fluent result is deviating much from theoretical one? Thanx in advance Regards, Niks@24 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems on H2/air CFX simulation | xulixian | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | April 14, 2009 16:00 |
| OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX | marco | Main CFD Forum | 81 | March 31, 2009 15:22 |
| solving ocean wave with Fluent or CFX? | gholamghar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 21, 2009 13:49 |
| Multiphase radiation in CFX | Luk_Fiz | CFX | 5 | March 17, 2009 04:51 |
| Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? | jobman | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 5, 2006 16:02 |
Linear Mode
