|
[Sponsors] |
Initial conditions for solid granular phase in Eulerian multiphase flow |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 24, 2022, 11:42 |
Initial conditions for solid granular phase in Eulerian multiphase flow
|
#1 |
New Member
Bharath Vittal
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I am using Eulerian Multiphase physics to model multiphase counter flow in blast furnace. I am trying to run a steady state case in which a solid granular phase enters the domain from the top and exits the domain at the bottom. The gas phase enters the domain from the bottom and exits at the top. The detailed geometry cannot be specified here because of confidential reasons. All the material properties are obtained from literature. Boundary conditions: For simplicity reason, the gas inlet velocity is set as 0 and a mass flow rate is specified at the top for the solid phase. Volume fraction for solid solid phase is specified both at inlet and outlet. Top pressure is atmospheric. My question is regarding the initial conditions: I am only specifying the velocity and volume fraction for solid granular phase. The velocity is calculated from the inlet mass flow rate. Any value of solid phase volume fraction above 0 throws a floating point error, whereas a with a zero solid volume fraction, the simulation runs, but does not converge. Could anyone throw some light into the reasons behind floating point error for any solid volume fraction above 0? Moreover, how to initialise in such case, without being far away from the steady state solution? |
|
Tags |
eulerian multiphase, fluent 19, granular flow, initial conditions |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Compressible flows with larger Courant numbers | Tobi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | February 26, 2021 16:20 |
laplacianFoam with source term | Herwig | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | November 19, 2019 14:47 |
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam turbulent case | Aditya Patil | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | April 24, 2017 23:13 |
pimpleFoam: turbulence->correct(); is not executed when using residualControl | hfs | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 29, 2013 09:35 |
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 04:34 |