CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT > Fluent Multiphase

Divergence detected in AMG solver. VOF.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 7, 2021, 01:02
Default Divergence detected in AMG solver. VOF.
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
Mr.Mister is on a distinguished road
Hi guys. I'm simulating air-water flow through a T pipe with 26mm inner diameter. The pipe was created in a 2D domain, there are two inlets (one for air and the other for water) and one outlet. The two inlets have velocity inlet conditions and the outlet has pressure outlet conditions. The pipe is filled with water and then water and air start to flow from the inlets with their respective inlet velocities. I'm conducting a mesh independence test with four meshes. The time-step for each mesh was calculated based on the CFL condition and the total flow time for each one was 6 seconds. The first three simulations had no problems but the fourth one is presenting the following problems after the bubbles reach the outlet (which occurred approximately in 2,3 seconds):

# Divergence detected in AMG for x-momentum: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for x-momentum, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum# Divergence detected in AMG for y-momentum: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for y-momentum, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum# Divergence detected in AMG for pressure correction: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for pressure correction, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction# Divergence detected in AMG for pressure correction: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for pressure correction, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction# Divergence detected in AMG for k: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for k, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: k# Divergence detected in AMG for omega: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for omega, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega
Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: k
Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega
Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: k
Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega
reversed flow in 118 faces on pressure-outlet 9.

Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: k
Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega
Error at host: floating point exception

Error at Node 0: floating point exception

Error at Node 1: floating point exception

Error at Node 2: floating point exception

Error at Node 3: floating point exception

Error: floating point exception
Error Object: #f

I checked the mesh quality and it looks good (min orthogonal quality = 0.68; max skewness = 0.60; max aspect ratio = 10.07). I tried to solve the problem by reducing the time step in half and decreasing the relaxation factors, but it didn't work. I don't know how to fix this problem, so I really need some help and I'm open to answering any questions. I'm going to list every piece of information I find relevant about the simulation.

General:
Parallel
Solver type: Pressure-Based
Time: Transient
Planar 2D space
Gravity on

Models:
Multiphase VOF with explicit formulation and Surface Tension Force Modeling (CSF)
Default Courant number: 0,25
Implicit Body Force
Turbulence Model: SST k-omega

Cell Zone Conditions:
Specified Operating Density: 1.225 kg/m³ (air density)

Boundary conditions:
air inlet velocity = 0.123 m/s
water inlet velocity = 0.6 m/s
outlet Gauge Pressure (pascal) = 0
pipe wall: stationary, no slip

Solution Methods:
PISO Scheme
Least Squares Cell Based Gradient
PRESTO! Pressure
volume fraction: Geo-Reconstruct
Momentum, Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Specific Dissipation Rate = Second order upwind
Transient Formulation = First order implicit

Solution Controls: Default

Residuals = 10e-5
Standard initialization with default initial values
Mr.Mister is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2021, 15:07
Question
  #2
New Member
 
Maharshtra
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Harshad Bhalerao is on a distinguished road
You got the solution of this problem ?
Harshad Bhalerao is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2021, 20:42
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
Mr.Mister is on a distinguished road
Hi Harshad Bhalerao,

I still dont know the answer. It has been months since i posted this and nobody posted a reply.
Mr.Mister is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2022, 05:34
Default
  #4
New Member
 
CHEN TING
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
CHEN TINGSEN is on a distinguished road
can you solve it
CHEN TINGSEN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 25, 2023, 08:10
Default AMG solver divergence
  #5
New Member
 
Outside North America
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 5
Tian Hongkang is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Mister View Post
Hi guys. I'm simulating air-water flow through a T pipe with 26mm inner diameter. The pipe was created in a 2D domain, there are two inlets (one for air and the other for water) and one outlet. The two inlets have velocity inlet conditions and the outlet has pressure outlet conditions. The pipe is filled with water and then water and air start to flow from the inlets with their respective inlet velocities. I'm conducting a mesh independence test with four meshes. The time-step for each mesh was calculated based on the CFL condition and the total flow time for each one was 6 seconds. The first three simulations had no problems but the fourth one is presenting the following problems after the bubbles reach the outlet (which occurred approximately in 2,3 seconds):

# Divergence detected in AMG for x-momentum: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for x-momentum, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum# Divergence detected in AMG for y-momentum: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for y-momentum, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum# Divergence detected in AMG for pressure correction: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for pressure correction, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction# Divergence detected in AMG for pressure correction: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for pressure correction, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction# Divergence detected in AMG for k: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for k, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: k# Divergence detected in AMG for omega: protective actions enabled!
# Divergence detected in AMG for omega, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!

Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega
Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: k
Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega
Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: k
Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega
reversed flow in 118 faces on pressure-outlet 9.

Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: y-momentum
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: k
Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega
Error at host: floating point exception

Error at Node 0: floating point exception

Error at Node 1: floating point exception

Error at Node 2: floating point exception

Error at Node 3: floating point exception

Error: floating point exception
Error Object: #f

I checked the mesh quality and it looks good (min orthogonal quality = 0.68; max skewness = 0.60; max aspect ratio = 10.07). I tried to solve the problem by reducing the time step in half and decreasing the relaxation factors, but it didn't work. I don't know how to fix this problem, so I really need some help and I'm open to answering any questions. I'm going to list every piece of information I find relevant about the simulation.

General:
Parallel
Solver type: Pressure-Based
Time: Transient
Planar 2D space
Gravity on

Models:
Multiphase VOF with explicit formulation and Surface Tension Force Modeling (CSF)
Default Courant number: 0,25
Implicit Body Force
Turbulence Model: SST k-omega

Cell Zone Conditions:
Specified Operating Density: 1.225 kg/m³ (air density)

Boundary conditions:
air inlet velocity = 0.123 m/s
water inlet velocity = 0.6 m/s
outlet Gauge Pressure (pascal) = 0
pipe wall: stationary, no slip

Solution Methods:
PISO Scheme
Least Squares Cell Based Gradient
PRESTO! Pressure
volume fraction: Geo-Reconstruct
Momentum, Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Specific Dissipation Rate = Second order upwind
Transient Formulation = First order implicit

Solution Controls: Default

Residuals = 10e-5
Standard initialization with default initial values

Hello, I recently encountered the same problem as you. Do you know the reason for this mistake? Thank you!
Tian Hongkang is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2024, 07:32
Default I am encountered with same problem did you get any solution
  #6
New Member
 
Rahul Vishwakarma
Join Date: Nov 2024
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Rahul Vishwakarma is on a distinguished road
I recently encountered the same issue, did anyone know how to avoid this.
Rahul Vishwakarma is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
amd divergence; vof; 2d


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jet impingement cooling error - Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature riquelme FLUENT 0 December 30, 2019 08:19
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction xinquanzhoucn FLUENT 5 July 21, 2014 05:49
Floating point error and divergence detected aannjj FLUENT 0 July 2, 2013 04:44
Error: Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum/ epsilon/ temperature bubuchacha FLUENT 6 February 26, 2013 04:30
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition SamCanuck FLUENT 2 August 31, 2011 12:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06.