CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT > Fluent Multiphase

multiphase volume fraction

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 15, 2020, 02:20
Default multiphase volume fraction
  #1
Member
 
Rakesh
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 15
rakadit is on a distinguished road
Dear Friends!

I am modelling gravity flow of water and air using ANSYS FLUENT and USING EULERIAN MULTIPHASE MODEL.The goemetry of the channel involves sudden slope changes at 3 points. At certian points, where volume fraction of water is very low in the order of 0.2 or so, values of parmeters like dynamic pressure etc. is found very high. basic formula 0.5*rho*v2 is not followed.

can anybody please explain the logic behind this type of results.

with thanks and regards,

Rakesh
rakadit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2020, 05:55
Default Dynamic Pressure
  #2
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Since dynamic pressure is a derived field and there is no conservation equation solved for it, hence, its value cannot be independent of velocity field. So, if dynamic pressure is wrong, so should be velocity field.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2020, 03:24
Default
  #3
Member
 
Rakesh
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 15
rakadit is on a distinguished road
Thanks so much for your reply!

Logically you are right.It should have happened like that. This mismatch between pressure and velocity field is there only in those regions where volume fraction of secondary fluid is very low in the order of 0.02 to 0.5.When volume frction is near to 1 of secondary fluid, this problem is not there.
kindly have a relook on the issue again.

with regards,

Rakesh
rakadit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2020, 07:42
Default Dynamic Pressure
  #4
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Probably, you are comparing wrong parameters. For VOF and mixture models, there is only one velocity field. This also means that there is only one density field as well. And that density field is defined as \alpha_{gas}\rho_{gas} + (1-\alpha_{gas})\rho_{liquid}. If you do not take this density into account then dynamic pressure calculation would not match with the expected values.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2020, 11:55
Default
  #5
Member
 
Rakesh
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 15
rakadit is on a distinguished road
Dear Mr. Vinerm,

Thanks again for your reply.

For your kind info, I am using Eulerian multiphase model,not mixture or pure VOF model. Can there be any effect due to sudden changes in slope of the channel in which I am modeling gravity flow.

Rakesh
rakadit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2020, 15:54
Default Slope changes
  #6
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Changes in the slope will affect the velocity-field, but it will not cause dynamic pressure to be different from what it should be. Check for one thing - define dynamic pressure using true and superficial velocities as two difference custom field functions. It is possible that the dynamic pressure is being defined using one of these while you are comparing against other. I would expect it to be based on true velocity but it is better to check.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2020, 05:18
Default
  #7
Member
 
Rakesh
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 15
rakadit is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the reply

Iam using ANSYS FLUENT COMMERCIAL CFD software. I am not using any custom defined functions in the simulation. I have obserevd that near the region of obstacle, fluent is calculating dynamic pressure as rho*v2 in place of 0.5*rho*v2. please comment and suggest.

with regards,

Rakesh
rakadit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2020, 05:28
Default Custom Field FuncLootion
  #8
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
vinerm will become famous soon enough
I am aware that you are using Fluent. Custom Field Functions are simple expressions that are defined in Fluent using primitive or derived variables. Look for Custom under User-Defined on top ribbon. I hope you know what are true and superficial velocities. You can use both and define two custom field functions representing dynamic pressure. In one, use superficial velocity and for the other one, use true velocity. Then compare these two with the dynamic pressure predicted by Fluent. It should match one of these.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Limiting volume fraction in interFoam sita OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 June 5, 2024 12:58
Why opening boundary for multiphase simulation must set Volume Fraction of each phase TerryNiu CFX 2 March 13, 2018 07:49
multiphaseEulerFoam high Courant number Frenk_T OpenFOAM 5 November 24, 2016 04:23
Solving the Volume Fraction Equation in a Multiphase M. Max585 FLUENT 1 March 20, 2012 08:49
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning gaottino OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 7 July 19, 2010 15:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:14.