|
[Sponsors] |
Why I am solving energies equations in the turbulent two-fluid model? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 14, 2020, 21:01 |
Why I am solving energies equations in the turbulent two-fluid model?
|
#1 |
Member
Min Zhang
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 9 |
Ansys/Fluent/Multiphase
Hello All, I am using the Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model (in Ansys Fluent) to simulate the solid-liquid two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe. This is the reference paper I am trying to reproduce: Eulerian-Eulerian Simulation of Particle-Liquid Slurry Flow in Horizontal Pipe Titus Ntow Ofei and Aidil Yunus Ismail Initially, I didn't know how to give the viscosity value of the solid phase. Then, I choose to use "kinetic-theory" to calculate the viscosity (please see the attachment1). Then I found that, I am solving two energies equations (Energy-p1 and Energy-p2) (please see the attachment2). I am wondering why? Am I supposed to solve the energy equations? I know that, for the solid phase calculation, such as pressure and viscosities, I am supposed to use the granular kinetic theory. In the "Multiphase Model" settings, I already set the "Partial Differential Equation" Granular Temperature Model. In addition, my simulation could not converge. Your valuable comments would be greatly appreciated! Last edited by minzhang; April 14, 2020 at 22:06. |
|
April 14, 2020, 21:06 |
The attachements
|
#2 |
Member
Min Zhang
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 9 |
These are the attachments.
Thanks! |
|
April 15, 2020, 06:46 |
Temperature
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Kinetic theory uses temperature to determine viscosity. If you you use kinetic theory to determine viscosity then temperature field is required. Though its on user whether he wants to solve this field or not. However, if you do not solve it then the viscosity is fixed and you don't really need to use kinetic theory. Do note that fixed does not imply that it is homogeneous.
Granular kinetic theory implies granular model and not a model for viscosity.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 15, 2020, 12:10 |
Solid phase viscosity calculation
|
#4 | |
Member
Min Zhang
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 9 |
Thanks for the reply!
In the "Multiphase Model - Phases - solid secondary phase", I chose the models for the Granular Viscosity, Granular Bulk Viscosity, Frictional Viscosity calculations, please see the attachment. So I think the solid phase viscosity is calculated by these models I choose here. Is that right? So I am wondering why I still need to specify the viscosity in "Materials - Fluid - silicon solid"? Thanks! Quote:
|
||
April 15, 2020, 12:42 |
Molecular Viscosity
|
#5 |
Senior Member
|
In Euler-Euler model. Navier-Stokes equations are solved for all the phases. The diffusion component require viscosity. The granular model provides extra stresses but diffusion component has its own role to play due to viscosity. However, the molecular viscosity plays role in a very small, low Re zone. So, you can use some small number, comparable to the primary phase.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
April 15, 2020, 13:31 |
Let me read more
|
#6 |
Member
Min Zhang
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello Vinerm,
Thanks for your reply. Let me read more about the solid phase viscosity. |
|
April 15, 2020, 15:55 |
Studying
|
#7 |
Senior Member
|
Yes, reading is always, always helpful.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
Tags |
solid-liquid flow |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[solidMechanics] Support thread for "Solid Mechanics Solvers added to OpenFOAM Extend" | bigphil | OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction | 686 | December 22, 2022 10:10 |
laplacianFoam with source term | Herwig | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | November 19, 2019 14:47 |
Floating point exception error | lpz_michele | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 53 | October 19, 2015 03:50 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence | jonmec | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | July 28, 2011 06:24 |