|
[Sponsors] |
Even with different superheat amount of vapor is same |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 7, 2020, 03:17 |
Even with different superheat amount of vapor is same
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Lolita
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 10 |
hello,
I am simulating a film boiling phenomenon. I am using following models: Multi-phase: VOF Scheme: Implicit Turbulence: k-e Methods: default Controls: default Phase change: Lee model (r = 0.1) My Problem is: Very little difference (almost overlapping in graph) in amount of vapor generation even when degree of super-heat is increased by 45K. regards |
|
March 7, 2020, 08:34 |
Pre-existing Vapor
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
What's the fraction of vapor at the initialization? The model requires a positive vapor fraction at initial stage.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
March 8, 2020, 01:41 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lolita
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 10 |
||
March 8, 2020, 05:29 |
EC model Implementation
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
The way the model is implemented, it checks for the minimum value of both phases to determine the mass transfer. If vapor fraction is always zero, the mass transfer will never begin.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What limits the amount of injected lagrangian particles? | Kabra | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | May 7, 2024 12:00 |
filed amount and vector definition | erfan1995 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | May 23, 2018 04:23 |
to find out amount of CO in flue gases | ambika dubey | CFX | 0 | April 17, 2015 02:44 |
Wall superheat bisection algorithm failed to converge | thermal0 | CFX | 0 | January 4, 2013 03:48 |
Amount of Gas Suction | Im | FLUENT | 0 | January 20, 2005 22:29 |