|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hello,
I am simulating a pressure swirl nozzle. I use RSM model. I achieve successful converge with 2D simulations using third order muscl. When I do 3D simulations, I am not able to converge the model neither with second order upwind nor muscl. My mesh has around 10 million polyhedral elements. Min. orthogonal quality is 0.3. Max. aspect ratio is 25. My goal is to have the solution with at least second order upwind, preferably with muscl. At the moment, I am using first order upwind in all spatial discretization schemes. If I switch to third order in momentum, I achieve convergence. Mainly, reynolds stresses does not converge using higher order. So how do I achieve at least second order accurate result? Reducing time step is not working. On the other hand, in terms of numerical accuracy, having the solution with momentum in third order and other schemes first order is advantageous or it may converge to a worse point than all first order upwind? Thanks in advance. Last edited by Baliztech; August 3, 2019 at 12:11. Reason: Grammar |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
muscl, rsm, vof |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with QUICK discretization scheme | baratian | Main CFD Forum | 14 | August 5, 2019 08:24 |
comparison of discretization scheme | alimea | Main CFD Forum | 23 | December 21, 2017 16:27 |
Temporal discretization Scheme CoEuler | vsammartano | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 12, 2016 07:06 |
Unknown Discretization scheme | dinonettis | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | March 16, 2008 08:52 |
New discretization scheme | arkangel | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | June 7, 2007 20:41 |