|
[Sponsors] |
Simulation data was exchanged between the two models |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 11, 2019, 09:48 |
Simulation data was exchanged between the two models
|
#1 |
Member
Emerson
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello everyone,
I'm very curious about how these authors manage to interchange data between models in Ansys Fluent. Basically, the paper says that run a simulation without considering the combustion effects of the reactions, in order to get distribution on the volume fraction only. Then, they use heterogeneous reactions to get combustion. And finally, they go back to the first model and do the calculation again using the data from the combustion. They used this flow chart to summarize the process. The part where they mention the two model coupling can see below, as the link for the original paper: "2.4. Coupling of the raceway formation and coal combustion processes The coupling of the raceway formation and the coal combustion process was realized by means of data exchanging. Specifically, the distribution of the coke particle volume fraction obtained by the raceway formation model decides the geometric profile of the main combustion region (i.e., the raceway). On the other hand, the generated additional gaseous mass and the temperature rising owing to the coal and coke particle combustion can change the continuity equation and the thermophysical properties of the gaseous phase used in the raceway formationmodel. The detailed procedures of data exchange are given as follows. After the combustion process in the initial raceway shape (obtained without consideration of the effects of the combustion reactions) was simulated, the particle mass loss and gaseous temperature were then stored at each cell of the computational domain.When the raceway formation processwas simulated once again, the mass loss of coal and coke particles was treated as an additional source term of the continuity equation of the gas phase, and the thermophysical properties of the gaseous phasewere recalculated based on the stored gaseous temperature. Then an updated coke particle distribution was obtained, which is equivalent to an updated raceway shape. The simulation of the particle combustion process was re-carried out using the geometric model that includes the updated raceway. In this way, the simulation data was exchanged between the two models. Based on the data exchange, the simulation of the particle combustion and raceway formation process continued in an alternated way. This alternated simulation process would not stop until the differences between the update and the previous results of the main dimensions of the raceway shape were small enough. These procedures were realized on the platform of ANSYS– FLUENT with user-defined functions (UDFs). The detailed steps are shown in Fig. 2." Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...952?via%3Dihub DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.067 Could someone help me? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays | Jeffzda | ParaView | 30 | November 6, 2023 22:00 |
[OpenFOAM] How to get the coordinates of velocity data at all cells and at all times | vidyadhar | ParaView | 9 | May 20, 2020 21:06 |
UDF value to large for defined data type | Anna73 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 9 | September 30, 2018 23:18 |
Export simulation data to 3d mesh | dlugi | OpenFOAM | 0 | May 19, 2011 05:47 |
Experimental And Simulation Data for my model | Timothy Song | Siemens | 0 | January 12, 2009 06:23 |