[Severin FENG]

Hello vidyadhar, this macro is assumed that the mass "destroyed" or "created" will have the same energy (from the Theory guide). So I always doubt that a direct use of a correlation between the mass transfer and temperature does not obey the conservation of energy. Simply for an example, the temperature of liquid is higher than that of gas with the same mass and enthalpy.

[bidax]

Originally Posted by vidyadhar

Correction to the original post:
Instead of DEFINE_Mass_Transfer, we should use DEFINE_SOURCE for adding source terms in continuity and energy equations.

hiiiii! have you solve your problem?
i'm working on this, i wang to know what differents between DEFINE_SOURCE and DEFINE_MASS_TRANSFER ?

And i wang to simulation evaporation of a 3d tube,i have some question,would you mind give me some advice?
1.) can i use simulation ?
2.) my iterations tend not to converage
thanks in advance!

[bidax]

Originally Posted by vidyadhar

Correction to the original post:
Instead of DEFINE_Mass_Transfer, we should use DEFINE_SOURCE for adding source terms in continuity and energy equations.

hiiiii! have you solve your problem?
i'm working on this, i wang to know what differents between DEFINE_SOURCE and DEFINE_MASS_TRANSFER ?

And i wang to simulation evaporation of a 3d tube,i have some question,would you mind give me some advice?
1.) can i use simulation ?
2.) my iterations tend not to converage
thanks in advance!