Result with TET mesh is more close to actual physical process than HEX mesh -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

April 6, 2018, 03:29

Result with TET mesh is more close to actual physical process than HEX mesh

princeks

New Member

prince kumar singh

Join Date: Jan 2016

Posts: 1

Rep Power: 0

Actually i am modeling the multiphase flow inside ladle shroud in which water is primary phase whereas air is secondary phase. I am measuring the Liquid free jet length in with HEX and TET mesh. but results with HEX mesh shows much deviation from reality but TET shows good agreement. Number of elements in case of TET mesh is 373k and HEX mesh it is 498k. What should i do??I am attaching the contours of both case.

Attached Files

contours.pptx (188.6 KB, 3 views)

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Too diffusive result on Delaunay type mesh for pipe	AlmostSurelyRob	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	7	October 8, 2018 14:34
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap	bobburnquist	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	6	August 26, 2015 10:38
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13	msrinath80	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	18	March 3, 2015 06:36
[OpenFOAM] ParaView shows bad cells, checkMesh doesn't seem to notice.	CoolHand	ParaView	2	August 21, 2014 16:58
[Gmsh] 2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH	aeroslacker	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	12	January 19, 2012 04:52

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:17.