|
[Sponsors] |
lower pressure drop compared to experimental value in Two phase flow calculations. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 16, 2017, 17:29 |
lower pressure drop compared to experimental value in Two phase flow calculations.
|
#1 |
Member
|
Hello Everyone,
Objective: To simulate Gas-liquid 2 Phase flow in FLUENT based on experimental data, and compare with respect to experimental data for a channel with a sudden area of expansion. I'm running the FLUENT 2 Phase flow (gas(Nitrogen)-liquid(Water)) Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase model, RSM (Reynold's Stresses 5 equation model) model for turbulence calculations. it's 2D steady-state analysis. Boundary Conditions: inlet: pressure Inlet, Outlet: pressure Outlet, Volume fraction is used for consideration between phases. (Values for boundary conditions are taken from Experimental calculations) Outcome: Computed Pressure Drop is lower than the experimental pressure drop across sudden expansion. Why is it showing lower pressure drop compared to experimental value? How can I get exact pressure drop value for expansion channel? |
|
Tags |
2-phase flow, eulerian eulerian, fluent, multi phase flow, reynolds stress model |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure drop in pipe flow with Large Eddy Simulation | xerox | FLUENT | 1 | October 16, 2019 09:55 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
2 phase flow in a pipe, reference pressure | wissal | CFX | 2 | April 13, 2017 08:08 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |
incompressible flow - prescribing pressure drop - how best to do it? | M. Gerritsen | Main CFD Forum | 4 | January 10, 1999 10:53 |