|
[Sponsors] |
May 11, 2017, 10:59 |
Particle Injection Clarification
|
#1 |
New Member
richie fluent
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
As I understand it, particles are released into the calculation when the DPM model is selected and is coupled (via selecting the "interaction with continuous phase" checkbox). Since this adds to the calculating time and produces residuals that spike at every cycle, things can become somewhat "unruly" when looking for convergence. What are some prudent selections for its' usage? (i.e., when, how often, how many cycles, etc...). I have this question because of the much simpler selection offered in the Graphics tab via Particle Tracks. Why are there 2 apparent versions? Is one for accuracy and the other for a quick visual version? How does one efficiently track particles?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF for particle injection using file | shahjehan | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 2 | June 28, 2020 11:44 |
Particle tracking error | alchem | OpenFOAM Bugs | 5 | May 6, 2017 17:30 |
particles leave domain | Steffen595 | CFX | 9 | March 7, 2016 17:19 |
injection problem | Mark New | FLUENT | 0 | August 4, 2013 02:30 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 02:29 |