CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT > Fluent Multiphase

Segmantation Fault - Mixture model + granular option

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 2, 2015, 08:07
Default Segmantation Fault - Mixture model + granular option
  #1
New Member
 
Raiz
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
Raiz is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

i want to simulate 2-phase flow through a pipe, where the primary phase is liquid & the secondary is solid.
I turned on the multiphase option in models and chose mixture model including slip velocities. I can choose the primary & secondary phases and run a simulation, but as soon as I turn on the granular option I get a segmentation fault as soon as I start simulating.

Is anybody familiar with this problem?
Raiz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 2, 2015, 09:44
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
I have this problem when I forget to hit the initialize button.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 2, 2015, 09:58
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Raiz
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
Raiz is on a distinguished road
I'm pretty sure I didn't forget to initialize.
Raiz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 12, 2015, 13:32
Default
  #4
Member
 
Jim
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 11
CFDYourself is on a distinguished road
I have had a similar problem using a similar model.

In my experience, fluent will give you a "segmentation fault" when it has looked for something that isn't there.

You get them all the time when setting up this type of model, and it's usually due to a problem with the way you have defined the materials, species, phases, the options for how the phases interact etc. you have to ensure these all suit the needs of the model you're trying to run.

In my experience the best way to do it is to find & do a tutorial that uses this model. once you're finished, try and set up your own case as close as you can keep to the tutorial.
CFDYourself is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2015, 12:26
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Raiz
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
Raiz is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your help.
I tried the granular option with the euler model and there were no problems. I still haven't figured it out in the mixture model. I'll try to vary the parameters as you said.

Do you have any tutorials for the mixture model with granular option? I haven't found any yet. I would appreciate it very much.

Any further advice is appreciated.
Raiz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 06:18
Default
  #6
Member
 
Jim
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 11
CFDYourself is on a distinguished road
Raiz, This is just a suggestion, and I don't have lots of experience with this type of model, but have you considered the possibility that the reason the Euler-granular model does not work with a mixture model is that it only works with a Euler-Euler model ?
Why do you want to use the mixture model if you already have a working euler-euler solution (that's arguably more accurate) ?
CFDYourself is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 11:16
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Raiz
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
Raiz is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the suggestion.
The reason I wanted to use the mixture model is that there already is a similiar simulation which used the mixture model, but I dont know where I went wrong or where selected wrong input parameters. Secondly I wanted to understand what I did wrong when using the model, plus the calculation time is shorter when using mixture model.
Raiz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2020, 10:05
Default Any solution?
  #8
New Member
 
Abhi
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 8
abhilasht is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiz View Post
Thanks for the suggestion.
The reason I wanted to use the mixture model is that there already is a similiar simulation which used the mixture model, but I dont know where I went wrong or where selected wrong input parameters. Secondly I wanted to understand what I did wrong when using the model, plus the calculation time is shorter when using mixture model.

I`m facing same problem. Did you solve the problem.
abhilasht is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2020, 10:22
Default Enter velocity for both phases
  #9
New Member
 
Abhi
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 8
abhilasht is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiz View Post
Thank you for your help.
I tried the granular option with the euler model and there were no problems. I still haven't figured it out in the mixture model. I'll try to vary the parameters as you said.

Do you have any tutorials for the mixture model with granular option? I haven't found any yet. I would appreciate it very much.

Any further advice is appreciated.

How did you get different phase velocities using mixture velocity data.
abhilasht is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difficulty in calculating angular velocity of Savonius turbine simulation alfaruk CFX 14 March 17, 2017 07:08
Error in Two phase (condensation) modeling adilsyyed CFX 15 June 24, 2015 20:42
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions Moinul Haque CFX 4 November 25, 2014 18:30
Setting rotating frame of referece. RPFigueiredo CFX 3 October 28, 2014 05:59
Modeling interface of fluid and porous, not with default setting ftab CFX 27 May 20, 2014 07:58


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:10.