|
[Sponsors] |
Divergence in Two phase flow in impeller for Cavitation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 5, 2014, 05:39 |
Divergence in Two phase flow in impeller for Cavitation
|
#1 |
New Member
Azarbayjan-e Sharqi (East Azerbaijan)
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Dear Friends
We are simulating the cavitation in an impeller, but unfortunately the solution diverges: Do you have any recommendation iter continuity x-velocity y-velocity z-velocity k epsilon vf-phase-2 time/iter reversed flow in 184 faces on pressure-outlet 7. 1 1.0000e+00 2.2754e-01 2.0786e-03 2.2741e-01 1.6760e+02 1.7002e+03 0.0000e+00 48:34:52 9999 turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of 1.000000e+05 in 2 cells reversed flow in 135 faces on pressure-outlet 7. 2 3.9495e-01 2.1120e-01 5.1330e-02 2.0287e-01 3.4835e-01 1.0742e+00 0.0000e+00 52:44:50 9998 reversed flow in 136 faces on pressure-outlet 7. 3 4.8944e-01 1.9892e-01 7.2566e-02 1.8881e-01 2.4924e-01 7.2195e-01 0.0000e+00 52:44:45 9997 reversed flow in 158 faces on pressure-outlet 7. 4 4.1480e-01 1.1867e-01 5.1597e-02 1.2584e-01 1.3764e-01 2.6765e-01 0.0000e+00 53:17:57 9996 reversed flow in 163 faces on pressure-outlet 7. 5 4.4587e-01 1.2438e-01 6.2952e-02 1.2580e-01 1.0816e-01 2.0903e-01 0.0000e+00 53:11:07 9995 reversed flow in 163 faces on pressure-outlet 7. 6 4.4594e-01 1.2414e-01 9.4380e-02 1.3768e-01 2.3518e-01 3.0147e-01 0.0000e+00 53:38:54 9994 turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of 1.000000e+05 in 11 cells reversed flow in 162 faces on pressure-outlet 7. 7 7.3659e-01 1.0458e-01 1.5275e-01 9.0316e-02 2.9884e+01 8.1153e+02 4.9588e-04 49:34:35 9993 reversed flow in 180 faces on pressure-outlet 7. turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of 1.000000e+05 in 198 cells 8 1.2326e+01 1.4642e-01 1.9726e-01 1.2146e-01 7.8176e+02 2.2140e+06 3.9421e-01 46:19:07 9992 reversed flow in 244 faces on pressure-outlet 7. turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of 1.000000e+05 in 6369 cells 9 2.0270e+03 3.6374e-02 2.0211e-01 7.3595e-02 2.5758e+03 4.9818e+07 2.3196e-01 43:09:24 9991 # Divergence detected in AMG solver: k -> Increasing relaxation sweeps! |
|
November 5, 2014, 09:10 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 732
Rep Power: 23 |
There are several reasons for divergence of AMG solver. Your mesh is too coarse, time-step is too large, turbulence boundary conditions not specified correctly and so on.
Also you may want to look at the turbulent viscosity. Although it is very common to have the turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of 1.000000e+05 warning but if it is not disappearing by the iterations then it is a matter of concern. You can plot turbulent viscosity or viscosity ratio and see where it is high and refine mesh in that region. |
|
November 5, 2014, 10:33 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Azarbayjan-e Sharqi (East Azerbaijan)
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
I am trying to model two phase of fluid in impeller the primary phase is water second is vapor water
Below is the last result that I got at the final iteration: How should the vf-phase-2 progress in iteration?... Thanks iter continuity x-velocity y-velocity z-velocity k epsilon vf-phase-2 time/iter AMG on GPGPU 11 7.7680e+04 5.7695e-02 9.2269e-02 9.3629e-02 3.7974e+01 2.8999e+05 9.3219e-02 25:42:53 9989 |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery | dowlee | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | August 6, 2021 07:40 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Divergence in Two phase flow. | black key | Fluent Multiphase | 0 | October 25, 2014 02:01 |
Divergence - two phase flow | narendra.gadwal | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 7, 2014 23:37 |
Two phase flow models | Atholl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 7, 2002 04:49 |