CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT > Fluent Multiphase

multiphase B.C

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 10, 2013, 07:50
Thumbs down multiphase B.C
  #1
Member
 
mehdimoradi
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 13
mehdimoradi. is on a distinguished road
Hi
in a multiphase project, inlet of each phase is separated from others. also for outlet, each phase exit from a outlet separate from other phases.
how can define these boundary conditions in fluent software?
please help me.
thanks
mehdimoradi. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2013, 03:59
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Do the phases separate "automatically" by bouyancy inside your domain, or how does this work? Can you post a picture?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2013, 15:47
Default
  #3
Member
 
mehdimoradi
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 13
mehdimoradi. is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz View Post
Do the phases separate "automatically" by bouyancy inside your domain, or how does this work? Can you post a picture?
Thanks RodriguezFatz.
a meshed layout of my project has been attached as a picture format.
Please help me.

Untitled.jpg
mehdimoradi. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2013, 02:44
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
So does it mean, the heavy particles entering on the two inlets at the top will fall down, whereas the air moves up and leaves at the top?
What I would do:
Three velocity inlets and two pressure outlets. Set operating density to zero, so you will include static pressure in your calculations. Then, set the pressure of your top outlet to zero and estimate your bottom outlet pressure with hydrostatic pressure drop.
Also, you could use a "degasing" outlet for the top. But I am not sure, what that physically means...
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2013, 03:30
Default
  #5
Member
 
mehdimoradi
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 13
mehdimoradi. is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz View Post
So does it mean, the heavy particles entering on the two inlets at the top will fall down, whereas the air moves up and leaves at the top?
What I would do:
Three velocity inlets and two pressure outlets. Set operating density to zero, so you will include static pressure in your calculations. Then, set the pressure of your top outlet to zero and estimate your bottom outlet pressure with hydrostatic pressure drop.
Also, you could use a "degasing" outlet for the top. But I am not sure, what that physically means...
It must be mentioned that in first of test, heavy particles enter bin to fill it completely and then they are exiting the bin with known mass flow rate. although new grain and inert enter the bin with outlet mass flow rate simultaneously. in other word the bin will be loaded completely during the tests.
about pressure out let at bottom, what setting in fluent software must be done to air (phase1) do not exit from the bottom?
mehdimoradi. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2013, 05:38
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
You can not create a simple outlet, that prevents air from exiting, as far as I know. How do you think this could work in a real experiment?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2013, 08:00
Default
  #7
Member
 
mehdimoradi
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 13
mehdimoradi. is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz View Post
You can not create a simple outlet, that prevents air from exiting, as far as I know. How do you think this could work in a real experiment?
In real experiment we use a screw conveyor with small pitch in out let of grain. Thus filled screw conveyor(with grains...) prevent from air exit.
mehdimoradi. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2013, 13:09
Default
  #8
Member
 
shubham
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17
shubham208011 is on a distinguished road
See you can assume that there is no air but in practical air is always there.

To visualize this lets assume spherical particle closely packed in a container (stand in vertical direction) which has conical bottom. How closely you pack these particle they end up leaving space between and around them which is called as void (air pockets) and this is the basis of solid bulk density.
Now in my personal opinion (which could be wrong) in your problem from macroscopic point of view we can assume that as air enters the system it rises upward and during upward motion it absorbs moister from only solid and exited from top. Since very small amount of air in compression to solid comes out from bottom and hence it is neglected.

But in CFD (finite volume/fluent) whole volume is divided into very very small control volume (microscopic level) and for each control volume continuity, heat transfer, mass transfer & other equations are solved and here volume fraction of different phases in each small control volume is a significant parameter and hence it is not possible in Fluent/CFD to say that only solid will come out from bottom
shubham208011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2013, 13:59
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 19
mjgraf is on a distinguished road
not that familiar with Fluent, but in CFX that bottom outlet you can set the volume fraction of air to be 0 and no air will exit. The top Air outlet needs to be set to degassing which will let the air out but act as a wall to the other phases.
mjgraf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2013, 12:28
Default Question
  #10
Member
 
mehdimoradi
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 13
mehdimoradi. is on a distinguished road
Hello mjgraf
If in Fluent, gravity force is activated, secondary phases exit from top outlet?
mehdimoradi. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2013, 12:33
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 19
mjgraf is on a distinguished road
guess that depends on the dynamics and buoyancy.
mjgraf is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiphase and Non Newtonian fluid wanna88 FLUENT 0 May 27, 2013 01:09
Axis B.C in multiphase problem SH_P FLUENT 8 December 24, 2011 13:54
Urgent! Help on UDF to set B.C. of 3rd type Ray Hong FLUENT 0 December 28, 2005 20:35
How to set B.C. of the 2nd or 3rd type in UDS? Ray Hong FLUENT 0 December 28, 2005 07:03
Problem of B.C. in Eulerian multiphase model Derek Jing FLUENT 0 May 12, 2002 12:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:16.