|
[Sponsors] |
April 29, 2010, 06:47 |
symmetry Boundary Conditions
|
#1 |
New Member
liang liam
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 17 |
hello every
I have a problem about...symmetry Boundary Conditions,Dose it means no flux of any property across that boundary ? the flux is heat? or?? thanks! |
|
May 2, 2010, 17:14 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
michael barkhudarov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 18 |
This is correct, all fluxes into the boundary are zero, and there is no friction at it.
|
|
May 3, 2010, 11:43 |
|
#3 |
New Member
liang liam
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 17 |
||
May 5, 2010, 00:55 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
michael barkhudarov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 18 |
Is there another mesh block on the other side of that boundary? If so, then this boundary will automatically be set as an inter-block boundary, which allow for a flow through it.
If it is stays a symmetry boundary, then there is definitely no flow through it. What makes you think there is flow? |
|
May 7, 2010, 10:50 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
liang liam
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
thanks!! now I see. I set another mesh block on the side! |
||
September 29, 2010, 04:59 |
|
#6 |
New Member
liang liam
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 17 |
I have some problems...
as you say... Is there another mesh block on the other side of that boundary? If so, then this boundary will automatically be set as an inter-block boundary, which allow for a flow through it. do you mean any boundary on the other side ? even P or Wall ? How do you know about that? I can't find any documents to prove that . sorry about my poor English~ |
|
September 29, 2010, 10:47 |
|
#7 |
Member
Stefano
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 17 |
yes, whatever you set, if two boundaries are connected, the connected boundaries are automatically switched to a special type called "inter-block" as soon as you run the simulation.
This happens for linked blocks and for nested blocks too. In this second case, clearly, only the boundaries of the inner block will be converted to the inter-block type. If you have two linked blocks, not of the same dimensions, the part of the boundary not connected to the other block will automatically become a wall. |
|
August 30, 2012, 10:05 |
boundary condition (symmetry vs periodic doubt)
|
#8 |
Senior Member
kunar
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear friends,
i am doing 3D wing analysis, i have doubt on boundary conditions in fluent ie both symmetry and periodic, anybody have the answer please let me know briefly,for what kind of purpose to use symmetry & periodic boundary conditions, please tell any example with problem. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions | Anindya | Main CFD Forum | 25 | February 27, 2016 13:58 |
CFX doesn't continue calculation... | mactech001 | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2009 22:25 |
what's wrong with my Robin boundary conditions? | hadesmajesty | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 23, 2009 05:57 |
Concentric tube heat exchanger (Air-Water) | Young | CFX | 5 | October 7, 2008 00:17 |
wall and symmetry boundary conditions | malik | FLUENT | 2 | April 22, 2008 08:48 |