F-Packing Function

ck5285 · February 5, 2010, 03:39

All would like to know if anyone did compare results between Default f-packing vs Reduce surface breakup in extreme cases? Is the 2nd option run slower due to additional surface treatment needed to prevent breakup of fluid?

MuxaB · February 10, 2010, 10:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by ck5285

All would like to know if anyone did compare results between Default f-packing vs Reduce surface breakup in extreme cases? Is the 2nd option run slower due to additional surface treatment needed to prevent breakup of fluid?

The difference in speed between different F-packing options is minimal. I doubt it will even be noticeable. The difference in the results depends on the type of problem and in many case is also minimal. I would recommend sticking to the default setting.

ck5285 · February 10, 2010, 20:51

Hi Michael, thanks for clarification.

February 5, 2010, 03:39	F-Packing Function	#1
ck5285 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 129 Rep Power: 17	All would like to know if anyone did compare results between Default f-packing vs Reduce surface breakup in extreme cases? Is the 2nd option run slower due to additional surface treatment needed to prevent breakup of fluid?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Compile problem	ivanyao	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	1	October 12, 2012 10:31
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning	gaottino	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	7	July 19, 2010 15:11
latest OpenFOAM-1.6.x from git failed to compile	phsieh2005	OpenFOAM Bugs	25	February 9, 2010 05:37
Error with Wmake	skabilan	OpenFOAM Installation	3	July 28, 2009 01:35
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh	Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing)	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	10	April 2, 2007 15:00

February 10, 2010, 20:51		#3
ck5285 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 129 Rep Power: 17	Hi Michael, thanks for clarification.