|
[Sponsors] |
March 12, 2009, 09:11 |
Re: Post Processing Capabilities
|
#21 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fran so how is the meshing capabilities comparison btw CFDesign vs Flow-3D?
|
|
March 12, 2009, 14:00 |
Re: Post Processing Capabilities
|
#22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
We are quite happy with meshing in FLOW3D. It is a simple way to mesh for experienced and non experienced engineers. CFDesign has an Automesh capacity which we do not use at all, we have to do it by hand. In the last version we have huge problems with memory and so we have neverhad with FLOW3D. For me meshing is not the problem. We have experienced strange results in CFDesign not corresponding with reality. Doing the same problem with FLOW-3D we have outstanding aproximations to reality. I hope this helps. |
|
March 12, 2009, 21:24 |
Re: Post Processing Capabilities
|
#23 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fran are you saying the tetra mesh used in CFDesign has most issue than structural mesh with Flow-3D for complex geometry? Can you advice on your application?
|
|
March 25, 2009, 16:10 |
|
#24 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi again. I only say that for the same physical problem we obtain different results in CFDesign and in F3D. Believe me that CFDesign`s results are non realistic at all, even with the thetraedral cells.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ansys Post processing | ano999 | ANSYS | 1 | May 27, 2011 17:24 |
NO model vs post processing in coal combustion,CFX | sakalido | CFX | 1 | April 15, 2011 15:07 |
post processing for KIVA | dirga | Main CFD Forum | 5 | April 23, 2009 11:58 |
Post Processing in FEM | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 26, 2004 12:59 |
post processing in CFD | MANISH BHARGAVA | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 17, 1998 21:51 |