|
[Sponsors] |
November 17, 2008, 11:57 |
absorption in porous media
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am modelling ink impact and absorption in porous media and I was looking at the influence of the grid size on the solution. Refining the grid at first gave similar results (up to 1e-3 s), but as I increased computation time (1e-2 to 1 s) the fine grid ink droplets show sooner equilibrium state than coarse grids. Moreover the absorption and spreading in coarser grids keep continuing in time. Why is this happening? Marjon
|
|
November 17, 2008, 23:37 |
Re: absorption in porous media
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hmmm, not sure. What numerical options (e.g., implicit/explicit) and physical models (surface tension, flow losses in porous medial, capipllary pressure) are you using?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiphase Porous Media Flow - Convergence Issues | VT_Bromley | FLUENT | 8 | May 30, 2024 03:59 |
Porous media setup issues in Fluent | Bernard Van | FLUENT | 29 | January 26, 2017 05:09 |
How to model granular flow through porous media | Axius | FLUENT | 2 | August 7, 2014 11:34 |
species mass source in porous media ? | PK | FLUENT | 0 | February 16, 2007 12:12 |
porous media: Fluent or Star-CD? | Igor | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 5, 2002 16:16 |