CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > FLOW-3D

Strange influence of initial condition?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 31, 2008, 05:02
Default Strange influence of initial condition?
  #1
Julien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi dear users,

I have observed a strange influence of initial condition that I don't understand :

I am working on a simple linear pipe which flowrate I measure using a baffle. My right boundarie condition is Outflow and I use turbulent model RNG. As initial condition I have set fluid zones with several different Xmax coordinate : the fluids ends at: - the end of the mesh - 5 m before - 10 m before - 20 m before It is the only parameter that changes. And the flowrate is very different at steady flow!! It is bigger when the distance between initial fluid and end of the mesh grows (*200%). And it is very small when initial fluid is set up to the end of the mesh. It seems to be strange as the geometry is the same...I suppose I don't understand well how the Outflow BcData works...The flowrate seems to be influenced by the velocity of the fluid when it reaches the end of the mesh? I have tried with specified pressure and continuative but it is very unstable.

Thanks

Julien

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2008, 11:42
Default Re: Strange influence of initial condition?
  #2
Michael Barkhudarov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Julien,

What boundary condition do you have at the inlet boundary?

You are right that the outflow boundary is sensitive to how fluid arrives at it. If the flow upstream from the boundary is not well defined, then the results may be upredictable.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2008, 03:45
Default Re: Strange influence of initial condition?
  #3
Julien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Michael,

In fact, my pipe starts in a reservoir which is defined by a specified pressure at upstream boundary condition. I use free surface or sharp interface option.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2008, 00:54
Default Re: Strange influence of initial condition?
  #4
michael barkhudarov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Julien,

Having a pressure on one side and outflow bc on the other does not fully define the problem. It should either flow rate (or velocity) and outflow, or pressure on both sides. Can you figure out what the pressure is at the outlet?

Michael
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2008, 03:03
Default Re: Strange influence of initial condition?
  #5
Julien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Michael,

despite I achieve having good results with setting a right distance between the end of my initial fluid and the end of the mesh...it can be an a useful method I think.

But in my case what would you advise me? I modell a dam on a lack, so that I need to fix the upstream fluid height. Then I want to compare the flowrate in three pipes under the dam : I have set the same geometry for each with the same mesh. But I don't want to impose the flowrate anywhere, just let the system free...which left and right boundary condition shall I use?

With continuative it is very unstable...

Concerning the pressure at the outlet, which is a section of pipe, I don't know what the pressure can be...

Julien
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2008, 10:20
Default Re: Strange influence of initial condition?
  #6
michael barkhudarov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Julien,

You need to position your downstream boundary so as to know something about the boundary conditions there, can't just leave it hanging there with the outflow bc. If the pipe outlets are submerged, then you can establish a hydrostatic pressure bc there by defining the fluid height. The height can be above the top of the mesh.

Michael
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2008, 06:03
Default Re: Strange influence of initial condition?
  #7
Julien Pralong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ok Micheal,

good to know, I will improve my methods in that direction, and thanks for answering so quickly my questions!

Julien
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 16 March 4, 2017 09:30
Compressible Nozzle Flow sebastian OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 September 21, 2016 11:47
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 16:33
SLTS+rhoPisoFoam: what is rDeltaT??? nileshjrane OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 February 25, 2013 05:13
Negative value of k causing simulation to stop velan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 October 17, 2008 06:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:19.