|
[Sponsors] |
October 4, 2008, 06:05 |
Free Gridding vs BFG
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
All Would like to understand if anyone have compared accuracy, simulation speed and effeciency between free griding from Flow-3D with others BFG (body fitted grid) CFD code?
Thanks and Regards CK |
|
October 6, 2008, 19:59 |
Re: Free Gridding vs BFG
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear CK,
Here is a general answer. Free gridding allows easy setup of both mesh and geometry. It also means good efficiency (overhead) and speed because neighboring cells are always known for calculations. FLOW-3D's FAVOR technique prevents the moment losses typically found in a structured grid so complex geometries can be captured with less resolution. That being said, the disadvantage is when needing to locally resolve a mesh for boundary layer effects. An unstructured grid can give you the local resolution without carrying it through the entire domain. F3D does have a multi-block option that can help in certain cases. Thank you, DTS |
|
October 8, 2008, 05:17 |
Re: Free Gridding vs BFG
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
DTS Thanks for your comments.
Regards CK |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can Flow-3D plot the free surface area in Iso-surface or colour variable? | therockyy | FLOW-3D | 1 | June 20, 2010 20:36 |
[Other] is free meshing or mapped meshing is best for flow problems | shanu | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | February 18, 2010 12:56 |
Body Fitted Grid (BFG) vs Free Gridding (FG) | CK | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 5, 2008 03:57 |
CFX 4.4 New free surface option | Viatcheslav Anissimov | CFX | 0 | April 3, 2002 07:27 |
Variable Density - Free Surface with FIDAP | Vitaliy Pavlyk | FLUENT | 7 | May 2, 2000 16:56 |