|
[Sponsors] |
November 12, 2020, 07:26 |
Head loss is less than it should be
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello colleagues!
I used Flow-3D to calculate the head losses in a pipe with a diaphragm (orifice) and got strange results. I have found that the piezometric head losses obtained with Flow-3D are lower than theoretically expected or measured experimentally. For example: a pipe with a diameter of 10 m (D), a diaphragm with a diameter of 7.5 m (d). Volume flow rate in the pipe is 1950 m3/s. I measure the pressure on the pipe lines at characteristic points located at a distance of -1D from the diaphragm and +5D from the diaphragm (along the flow vector and assuming the diaphragm coordinate is 0). Under these conditions, I should get a piezometric head loss of about 80 m (according to Borda's formula and experiment). In Flow-3D I get a loss of about 60 m. The result is not affected by the boundary conditions, mesh size, turbulence model, or even the fluid viscosity. The numbers turn out to be a little different, but conceptually the result is the same. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Head loss in sudden expansion: how evaluate it numerically | MFN | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 4, 2018 10:15 |
CFD by anderson, chp 10.... supersonic flow over flat plate | varunjain89 | Main CFD Forum | 18 | May 11, 2018 08:31 |
head loss determination | suyash1234 | FLUENT | 1 | September 13, 2015 14:44 |
How to deifmne head loss co effcint ? | Angelina | FLUENT | 1 | February 8, 2006 10:41 |
How to deifmne head loss co effcint in cfx? | Angelina | CFX | 4 | February 7, 2006 14:14 |