|
[Sponsors] |
September 17, 2015, 13:35 |
Finish time for very long simulations
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi guys
I'm interested in studying silting in reservoirs, which takes months - often years - for most effects to be fully visible. I know FLOW-3d works with seconds as time unit, and using tens of millions of seconds as finish time is not doable at all. So is there a way to circumvent this? |
|
September 22, 2015, 00:30 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Taimoor Ahmad
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello. You can focus your study on a particular area for critical sediment discharges and repeat for other parameters. But the area and time are certainly limited by computational power. A 1D software might be more suitable.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
pimpleFoam: turbulence->correct(); is not executed when using residualControl | hfs | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 29, 2013 09:35 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | August 26, 2013 08:47 |
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 04:34 |