|
[Sponsors] |
July 27, 2011, 05:58 |
FloEFD Adaptive meshing
|
#1 |
New Member
Pieter van Eeden
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi all,
I am learning FloEFD and have started playing around with adaptive meshing. When I run the simulation and I look at the graph of one of my goals, it seems to converge to a certain value. But when I hit the refine option, the value of the goal drops on the graph and after a few iterations it picks up again to the previous value it was converging to. Everytime I do that the dip is there and it seems to be going to the same values. Shouldn't this dip disappear as the simulation converges? How often does one refine? I tried on every 10 iterations, then 20 and then 40. Same pattern. Any advice? Pieter |
|
July 27, 2011, 06:55 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Pieter van Eeden
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 15 |
I found that increasing the total number of cells when the mesh refines each time makes this drop in value less. I will continue increasing number of cells until I do not get a drop anymore when I do a refine. This should tell me if the mesh is refined enough. Does this make sense? Am I correct in my assumption?
|
|
July 27, 2011, 10:37 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Pieter van Eeden
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 15 |
Got to a maximum number of cells, and the dip is still there. I am missing something here. Anybody help?
|
|
August 1, 2011, 09:17 |
|
#4 |
Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 616
Rep Power: 24 |
Hi vaneedenp,
no, please don't refine too often. Usually I refine maximum 3 times, usually I use 2 times. This drop depends on if you look on absolute or normalized values. It is completely normal to have a jump like that. The strength of the jump can be less for other parameters. You should also always work from a reasonable good mesh as the adaptive refinement is based on the actual results. So if you have a bad mesh you would refine on bad results which doesn't give a good refinement. These refinements are used to refine areas of stronger gradients as for example on a nozzles, flow separations like in a 90° bent or behind a blunt body or in a shok front to better resolve the physics and parameters over such gradients. If you want to see if you have a mesh convergence (values don't change anymore with finer mesh) you can do a refinement and if the value converges again towards the same as before you won't get any better results after 10 further refinements. I hope this helps, Boris |
|
August 1, 2011, 09:44 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Pieter van Eeden
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 15 |
Hallo Boris,
Thank you for your reply. I try to set up a proper mesh before I start. For the critical areas I do a local initialised mesh and try to get the spacing between cells as good as possible to have enough cells in small openings. When I run the simulation and refine it looks as if it converges to the same value. Which tells me that the mesh is good if I use your criteria. Thanx for the info! |
|
Tags |
adaptive mesh, floefd, refine |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
adaptive meshing | clifford bradford | Main CFD Forum | 14 | September 3, 2022 20:13 |
Adaptive meshing technique | kpsudhakar | CFX | 2 | January 18, 2018 17:25 |
Adaptive meshing in CFX-5.5 | zahid | CFX | 1 | June 11, 2003 19:37 |
Adaptive meshing | Michelle | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 26, 2003 20:04 |
Adaptive Meshing | Chan K I | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 27, 2000 03:40 |