|
[Sponsors] |
May 14, 2008, 06:18 |
Numerics
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
I trying to mix a scalar in a turbulent flow field in order to estimate mixing times. Now I see a lot of diffusion, maybe too much. How can I distinguish numerical and real turbulent diffusion? I think I need to control the numerical scheme. Where can I do that? Which order is it anyway? Cheers, Astrid |
|
May 18, 2008, 19:20 |
Who's responding????????
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Who's responding? No one?
In the past, I used CFX-4.2 at the university. Recently, I am saddled with EFD.Lab. Very fancy, but I would like to get more grip on what's behind. To convince at least the customer and my boss...... Astrid |
|
May 30, 2008, 09:04 |
Re: Who's responding????????
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Astrid,
The difference scheme used is described in section 3.2 of the fundamentals.pdf document, which you can find in the list when you launch EFD from Start/All Programs. John. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question Regarding Turbulence Numerics | cfdengineer | CFX | 7 | January 27, 2016 17:06 |
Turbulence Numerics | Zaktatir | CFX | 4 | September 24, 2010 03:41 |
Vortex shedding, FSI-analysis, turbulence numerics | tallknuseren | CFX | 3 | May 10, 2010 05:31 |
tef numerics option | Felix | CFX | 2 | September 25, 2008 10:45 |
separating physics and numerics? | Maxim Umansky | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 18, 2004 09:53 |