|
[Sponsors] |
Why is there a great difference between numeca and cfx???? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 12, 2011, 11:21 |
Why is there a great difference between numeca and cfx????
|
#1 |
New Member
ski
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,I am simulating a low-speed compressor now,the maximum inlet velocity is 30m/s. but i found that at the corner of stators there is a great total pressure loss in numeca while in the cfx the loss is much smaller. I have used sa and some low Reynolds number k-e model in numeca and rng-ke and k-e model in cfx. The yplus is around 2 in both soft.
Why is there a great difference between numeca and cfx? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shock capture in CFX | BalanceChen | CFX | 2 | June 7, 2011 08:25 |
Import CFXTurbogrid(*.gtm) file to NUMECA | csmistry | Fidelity CFD | 5 | March 12, 2011 02:57 |
CFX, Fluent and Numeca? | SA | FLUENT | 3 | March 22, 2008 15:46 |
Can Numeca mesh export to other format? | Andy Cong | Fidelity CFD | 1 | April 4, 2006 07:18 |
NUMECA vs CFX | Iann | Fidelity CFD | 5 | February 24, 2006 16:26 |